Skip to content

Conversation

mbartlett21
Copy link
Contributor

None of the other examples have extra lines below the #![feature(...)] statements, so I thought it appropriate that these examples shouldn't either.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 27, 2021
@apiraino apiraino added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 28, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 28, 2021

📌 Commit aa48de0 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 28, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#90082 (Fix minor typos)
 - rust-lang#90336 (Remove extra lines in examples for `Duration::try_from_secs_*`)
 - rust-lang#90376 (Various cleanups around opaque types)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit ae244d8 into rust-lang:master Oct 29, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Oct 29, 2021
@mbartlett21 mbartlett21 deleted the patch-4 branch October 29, 2021 02:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants