build: build cdk package #4111
Merged
build: build cdk package #4111
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Introduces another package called `@angular/cdk`. This package is currently empty but all the logic for SASS, HTML, TypeScript and tests is ready.
googlebot
added
the
cla: yes
jelbourn
added
pr: lgtm
action: merge
|
Any ETA on a first release of this package and info about what it will contain? |
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@angular/cdk. This package iscurrently empty but all the logic for SASS, HTML, TypeScript and tests
is ready.
Note: Stuff like for the releasing is still missing. But this might be a start. Also I feel like the solution with the tests is not a perfect one. Also the logic will be simplified in a follow-up #4108