Skip to content

Conversation

@jangorecki
Copy link
Member

closes #4887

It is forked from https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/tree/frollmax branch, therefore should be rebased to master once #5441 will be merged. Till then it is probably best to look at the diff here: https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/compare/frollmax..frollapply

@jangorecki
Copy link
Member Author

@MichaelChirico
Copy link
Member

@jangorecki would you mind marking as draft any froll-related PR which should wait for review? I assume you have a sequence in mind for when they should be merged to avoid conflicts.

@jangorecki
Copy link
Member Author

jangorecki commented Feb 19, 2024

I think drafts make sense when new changes are expected, other then rebasing/merging to master. This PR is ready for review as much as it can, so marking it as draft takes away the chance for extra eyes looking at it.

@jangorecki
Copy link
Member Author

superseded by #7272

@jangorecki jangorecki closed this Aug 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add by.column=F argument in frollapply

2 participants