-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
frollapply rewritten, supports by.column=F #5575
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Marco Colombo <[email protected]>
|
Exact diff when forked from frollmax branch https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/compare/a14b486e4978da65c469eb39f41c19018e91f846..21da019f63947c28f9cb93fdf8f275bd52461dd5 |
|
@jangorecki would you mind marking as draft any froll-related PR which should wait for review? I assume you have a sequence in mind for when they should be merged to avoid conflicts. |
|
I think drafts make sense when new changes are expected, other then rebasing/merging to master. This PR is ready for review as much as it can, so marking it as draft takes away the chance for extra eyes looking at it. |
|
superseded by #7272 |
closes #4887
It is forked from https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/tree/frollmax branch, therefore should be rebased to master once #5441 will be merged. Till then it is probably best to look at the diff here: https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/compare/frollmax..frollapply