Skip to content

Conversation

@foolip
Copy link
Member

@foolip foolip commented Apr 18, 2024

Fixes #253.

@foolip foolip requested a review from jcscottiii April 18, 2024 09:17
@foolip
Copy link
Member Author

foolip commented Apr 18, 2024

This depends on #254 and I'd like to rebase it after that lands.

reviewers.sort();

assert.deepEqual(reviewers, [
'annevk', 'jdm', 'zqzhang'
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In other words, if a PR touches both WEB_FEATURES.yml and tests, it gets routed only to the regular reviewers. I think this is best for the long term, that we don't expect web-features maintainers to review every such change. We just want to reduce the noise from changes that are purely web-features.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes sense for now. And we can always improve the linting (for example, linting based on the vendored data.json) to help regular reviewers have confidence in those changes.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that would be good even if you and I are the only reviewers, because we'll never catch all minor typos :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Avoid pinging reviewers for WEB_FEATURES.yml changes

3 participants