Skip to content

Conversation

@captainbrosset
Copy link
Contributor

@captainbrosset captainbrosset commented Mar 27, 2024

This PR describes all the features that don't yet have a description field. Fixes #736.
This PR also makes the description field mandatory so that, going forward, we have to have descriptions.

Reviewers: most of this is taken from MDN, Can I Use, specs, and Wikipedia. My goal was to cover 100% of files, not to be 100% correct on all of them. I believe that once we have the descriptions in place, at least, we can't introduce new features without descriptions, but we can always improve the existing ones.

@captainbrosset captainbrosset requested review from ddbeck and foolip March 27, 2024 10:04
@captainbrosset

This comment was marked as outdated.

@captainbrosset

This comment was marked as outdated.

@captainbrosset captainbrosset marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2024 14:32
@captainbrosset captainbrosset requested a review from foolip March 27, 2024 14:32
@foolip
Copy link
Collaborator

foolip commented Mar 27, 2024

@captainbrosset I see that you resolved conflicts, but by replacing the original descriptions. Unless you think they're bad, can you back those changes out to focus only on missing descriptions?

@foolip
Copy link
Collaborator

foolip commented Mar 27, 2024

Thinking about how to get this done with maximum velocity, I think having a single big PR is going to lead to a lot of good descriptions being held back by discussions on a few tricky cases. I would suggest splitting this into many small PRs, perhaps not one per descriptions, but at most 10 per PR so that review comments are manageable on each. Other than alphabetically, I think the easiest split would be by spec, and would do some amount of useful clustering.

@captainbrosset
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this PR and opening multiple smaller PRs instead.

@captainbrosset
Copy link
Contributor Author

This has now been replaced by #750, #751, #752, #753, #754, #755, #756, #757, #758, #759, #760, #761.

@foolip foolip deleted the descriptions branch April 10, 2024 09:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Publish descriptions

3 participants