[pull] swiftwasm from main #1837
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![pull[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/12910?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This was fixed by swiftlang#33235 rdar://66389949
Currently some of the headers get included into `WinSDK.WinSock2` via windows.h
…when the module is built with that flag. Fixes rdar://69322538.
I don't have a test case for this bug based on the current code. But the fix is clearly needed to have a unique AccessStorage object for each property. The AccessPath commits will contain test cases for this functionality.
…cker Also perform the plumbing necessary to convince the rest of the compiler that they're just ordinary external dependencies. In particular, we will still emit these depenencies into .d files, and code completion will still index them.
This completes the missing piece from swiftlang#34073 and means the frontend may now serialize moduledecl-based dependencies.
Do I really need to justify this?
If we're searching for a declaration with a given name, the name should be entirely encapsulated inside the DeclConsumer. Otherwise, there might not be a specific name at all, if we're performing code completion for example (once LookupVisibleDecls starts to use ASTScope, anyway).
Treat any incremental external depends like normal external depends. This will eventually become the fallback behavior for cross-module incremental builds.
…le, make ReflectionMirror.mm a .cpp file (swiftlang#34025)
…fatal-backtrace.swift [test] Re-enable linux-fatal-backtrace.swift
Differentiate Cross-Module Incremental Dependencies
WinSDK: extract Performance submodule
…-of-a-concurrency-experiment Emit -enable-experimental-concurrency into module interfaces
…anups More ASTScope cleanups
This reverts commit ef972eb.
Change SIL ref_element_addr getFieldNo() to return a unique index.
kateinoigakukun
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot]. Want to support this open source service? Please star it : )