Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link

Latest update from rustc.

Kobzol and others added 30 commits April 16, 2025 07:36
Remind to update dev branch while behind too many commits
toolchain version does not need to be specified
fix(docs): add newlines between prefix/suffix chapters
add rdg push git config entry for git protocol pushers
Fix link to GatherBorrows
Pull recent changes from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust via Josh.

Upstream ref: c96a690
Filtered ref: 7b9552d4c39c31aabf6749629da2d4a7e6e1cd60

This merge was created using https://github.com/rust-lang/josh-sync.
@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented Jul 28, 2025

Hmm, the workflow still didn't run, not sure why.

@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Jul 28, 2025

Workflows do not get triggered by bot commits

@lnicola lnicola enabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 07:40
@lnicola lnicola disabled auto-merge July 28, 2025 07:40
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Jul 28, 2025

I remember having the same issue with releaes-plz on salsa, though I noted down my findings but I can't find the relevant links anymore

@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented Jul 28, 2025

Wait, really? Then how are we supposed to merge this? And how can we tell that CI would fail because of a breaking change to rustc_abi?

@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Jul 28, 2025

Yea that's the issue, these setups are incompatible with merge queues 🙃 The only proper fix I think is having the bot author the final commit by a non-bot iirc.

@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Jul 28, 2025

Related peter-evans/create-pull-request#48
https://help.github.com/en/articles/events-that-trigger-workflows#example-using-more-than-one-event

An action in a workflow run can't trigger a new workflow run. For example, if an action pushes code using the repository's GITHUB_TOKEN, a new workflow will not run even when the repository contains a workflow configured to run when push events occur.

@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented Jul 28, 2025

CC @Kobzol can you take a look at this (and peter-evans/create-pull-request#48 (comment) in particular)?

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Jul 28, 2025

Sorryy, I forgot to send a follow-up PR. We can solve this with triagebot. I'll send it when I'm at a PC.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Jul 28, 2025

Here it is: #20330

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Jul 28, 2025

To unblock this specific PR, just close and reopen it.

@lnicola lnicola closed this Jul 28, 2025
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 28, 2025
@lnicola lnicola reopened this Jul 28, 2025
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 28, 2025
@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Jul 28, 2025

Btw I'm not sure why triagebot flagged this PR, it should already be configured properly 🤔 (https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/ffeb325e09d9b5f2450f10cde8592ef8ffe2b922/triagebot.toml#L20)

@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented Jul 28, 2025

To unblock this specific PR, just close and reopen it.

Thanks, I hate it 😀.

Btw I'm not sure why triagebot flagged this PR, it should already be configured properly

It was configured after this PR was filed.

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Jul 28, 2025

Thanks, I hate it 😀.

Yeah, it's not ideal 🙈 For next PRs, triagebot will autoclose/autoopen for you. We're working on switching the CI token to a GitHub app, that should allow running CI automatically without this hack.

@lnicola lnicola added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 28, 2025
@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented Jul 28, 2025

Just asking, did you see the workaround of using another token with the repo scope? I'm not sure about the security implications though.

Merged via the queue into master with commit 511c999 Jul 28, 2025
15 checks passed
@lnicola lnicola deleted the rustc-pull branch July 28, 2025 17:54
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 28, 2025
@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented Jul 28, 2025

We can use a personal token, which we did historically, but we want to move away from that. GH apps should be the way to go.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.