Add min_pyver_end_position option
#5386
Conversation
DanielNoord
force-pushed
the
min-pyver-end
branch
from
c6cce06 to
3615219
Compare
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1502692283
💛 - Coveralls |
|
|
||
| If you need special control over Pylint's configuration, you can also create a .rc file, which | ||
| can have sections of Pylint's configuration. | ||
| The .rc file can also contain a section ``[testoptions]`` to pass options for the functional |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👌 This is very useful ! I wish I had that when starting out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't had much time the last few days. Just trying to catch up now.
min_pyver_end_position was exactly what I though off with my proposal. At the moment I agree that we don't need it. However there are still some AST node types left that don't have position information and just might get some in a future release.
| "min_pyver": Minimal python version required to run the test | ||
| "max_pyver": Maximum python version required to run the test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This isn't completely true. Whereas min_pyver acts inclusively, max_pyver is exclusive due to the way tuple comparisons and sys.version_info work in Python.
I.e. an alpha release would be (3, 11, 0, 'alpha', 0) > (3, 11). Thus setting max_pyver = 3.11 effectively excludes 3.11 and above.
IMO that is the desired behavior as otherwise one would need to say something like 3.10.99 to exclude 3.11+. So just the documentation that should get updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @cdce8p for reviewing even after we already merged, much appreciated!
I'll create a PR that updates the doc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@cdce8p Any good ideas about how to describe this. I have been trying for 5 minutes but can't come up with a simple but correct sentence 😆
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"max_pyver": Starting from that python version for the test won't be run ?
doc/whatsnew/<current release.rst>.Type of Changes
Description
Ref #5349 (comment).