Skip to content

Conversation

@paf31
Copy link
Contributor

@paf31 paf31 commented Jun 9, 2017

Closes #97

@ethul @andreypopp @joneshf Does the attribution in particular look good?

@ethul
Copy link
Contributor

ethul commented Jun 9, 2017 via email

@paf31
Copy link
Contributor Author

paf31 commented Jun 9, 2017

I would actually prefer to assign copyright by name to everyone involved, so it's completely clear, but those names would probably have to go in a separate file since there are a few at this point.

@ethul
Copy link
Contributor

ethul commented Jun 9, 2017 via email

@paf31
Copy link
Contributor Author

paf31 commented Jun 11, 2017

@andreypopp What do you think?

@andreypopp
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for not replying earlier. I have no concerns. The MIT license is what I intended actually.

@paf31 paf31 merged commit 4154696 into master Jun 12, 2017
@paf31 paf31 deleted the license branch June 12, 2017 21:03
@paf31
Copy link
Contributor Author

paf31 commented Jun 12, 2017

Thanks everyone!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants