Add LICENSE file

[paf31]

I noticed this repo has never had a LICENSE file which is ... not ideal. Since this package appears as a dependency of several others, I think it's important for it to have a clear license.

The line "license": "MIT" was added to bower.json fairly early on (commit e36352cb21a), which I interpret to mean that this library has been MIT-licensed implicitly since then. I suggest we adopt the MIT license with a copyright notice assigning copyright to "the purescript-react contributors" or something along those lines.

cc @andreypopp @joneshf @ethul Does that sound good?

[ethul]

Sounds good to me!

…

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 20:42 Phil Freeman ***@***.***> wrote: I noticed this repo has never had a LICENSE file which is ... not ideal. Since this package appears as a dependency of several others, I think it's important for it to have a clear license. The line "license": "MIT" was added to bower.json fairly early on (commit e36352c <e36352c>), which I interpret to mean that this library has been MIT-licensed implicitly since then. I suggest we adopt the MIT license with a copyright notice assigning copyright to "the purescript-react contributors" or something along those lines. cc @andreypopp <https://github.com/andreypopp> @joneshf <https://github.com/joneshf> @ethul <https://github.com/ethul> Does that sound good? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#97>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAVYy3HnJOlZ2yGGLunqThXtXPTEkAsSks5sCJUMgaJpZM4N0x9S> .

[joneshf]

Same.