-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Add offered qos incompatible event and event executor test #11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add offered qos incompatible event and event executor test #11
Conversation
rcljava/src/main/java/org/ros2/rcljava/events/publisher_statuses/OfferedQosIncompatible.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
😂 |
jacobperron
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Besides the minor comments above, this LGTM
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
9951769 to
d7ad984
Compare
|
I have rebased |
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
|
@jacobperron there are some event statuses that we want but are not available in foxy (e.g. message lost), should we create a (edit) that should be done after completing basic event handling support in the foxy branch |
|
Unrelated, but I want to get rid of all stale branches. |
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
Yeah, feel free to create a
Go ahead and delete stale branches 👍 |
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Santiago Paunovic <[email protected]>
(edit) #10 has already been merged.
This PR is build on top of #10.
It adds a new publisher event status:
OfferedQosIncompatible.That new event status is used to test the executor code in #10, which surprisingly works without changes.
There are some other cosmetic changes here.
I will rebase and redirect the PR to
feature/eventswhen #10 gets merged.