-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
Do not mark indexed access object type comparisons as unreliable. #54781
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@typescript-bot pack this |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the perf test suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the tarball bundle task on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite (tsserver) on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite (tsserver) on this PR at 8d94382. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Hey @DanielRosenwasser, I've packed this into an installable tgz. You can install it for testing by referencing it in your
and then running There is also a playground for this build and an npm module you can use via |
@JoshuaKGoldberg Any chance you could throw the above package ( |
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing There were infrastructure failures potentially unrelated to your change:
Otherwise... Something interesting changed - please have a look. Details
|
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing There were infrastructure failures potentially unrelated to your change:
Otherwise... Everything looks good! |
@DanielRosenwasser Here they are:
CompilerComparison Report - main..54781
System
Hosts
Scenarios
TSServerComparison Report - main..54781
System
Hosts
Scenarios
StartupComparison Report - main..54781
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
@typescript-bot cherry-pick this to release-5.1 |
Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the task to cherry-pick this into |
Hey @DanielRosenwasser, I've opened #54786 for you. |
Component commits: 8d94382 Do not mark indexed access object type comparisons as unreliable.
Hey @DanielRosenwasser, the results of running the DT tests are ready. |
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitely will need to revert this revert eventually, but we absolutely need to make some things more efficient first to compensate.
Can we add a non-strict @types/lodash
usage to the extended test suite (as that's what this fixes), since the DT run won't cover it? It's just a new folder in https://github.com/microsoft/typescript-error-deltas/tree/main/userTests right?
I believe so, @jakebailey can help you there. |
@DanielRosenwasser Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
Reverts the checker change in #52106.
Fixes #54542.
See #54754 for a hopefully better long-term fix.
Reopens #52096.