-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
Mark indexed access object type comparisons as unreliable #52106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mark indexed access object type comparisons as unreliable #52106
Conversation
@typescript-bot perf test this |
Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the perf test suite on this PR at 1864356. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
@typescript-bot test this |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at 1864356. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at 1864356. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at 1864356. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at 1864356. You can monitor the build here. |
Anything that messes with variance-based vs. structural relations has me worried. Let's see what the test suites uncover. |
I’m confused - there don’t appear to be any indexed accesses in #52096? |
|
@ahejlsberg Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing Everything looks good! |
Heya @ahejlsberg, I've run the RWC suite on this PR - assuming you're on the TS core team, you can view the resulting diff here. |
@ahejlsberg Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
@weswigham Here they are:
CompilerComparison Report - main..52106
System
Hosts
Scenarios
TSServerComparison Report - main..52106
System
Hosts
Scenarios
StartupComparison Report - main..52106
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
All the suites and perf look fine, nice~ |
@ahejlsberg any remaining concerns? |
@ahejlsberg @weswigham should this go in for 5.0 beta? |
@weswigham I think we can get enough coverage by merging this at the beginning of 5.1, so I vote to merge it now. |
Fixes #52096