chore: comment crypto swap, add hover effects, update ui library #89
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe pull request involves modifications across multiple TypeScript files, primarily focusing on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-escrow-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (31)
web/src/styles/commonStyles.ts (2)
3-5: Specify transition properties and timing functionThe transition declaration is too generic. This could cause unintended transitions on all properties.
Consider being more specific:
export const hoverShortTransitionTiming = css` - transition: 0.1s; + transition: all 0.1s ease-in-out; `;
7-9: Consider using CSS variables for transition durationsFor better maintainability and runtime customization, consider using CSS variables.
Here's a suggested implementation:
+export const transitionDurations = css` + :root { + --transition-short: 0.1s; + --transition-long: 0.2s; + } +`; export const hoverLongTransitionTiming = css` - transition: 0.2s; + transition: all var(--transition-long) ease-in-out; `;web/src/hooks/useIsDesktop.tsx (1)
5-5: Consider making the breakpoint configurableThe breakpoint is hardcoded which reduces the hook's reusability.
Consider accepting the breakpoint as a parameter:
-import { BREAKPOINT_LANDSCAPE } from "styles/landscapeStyle"; -const useIsDesktop = () => { +const useIsDesktop = (breakpoint = BREAKPOINT_LANDSCAPE) => { // ... rest of the implementation - return useMemo(() => width > BREAKPOINT_LANDSCAPE, [width]); + return useMemo(() => width > breakpoint, [width, breakpoint]); };web/src/styles/landscapeStyle.ts (1)
3-4: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.The new constant follows naming conventions and provides a reasonable max-width value for landscape views.
Consider adding a JSDoc comment to document the purpose and usage of this constant:
+/** Maximum width for landscape orientation containers */ export const MAX_WIDTH_LANDSCAPE = "1400px";web/src/components/OverlayPortal.tsx (2)
5-12: Consider extracting z-index to theme constants.The hardcoded z-index value could lead to layering issues. Consider moving it to a theme constants file for better maintainability.
const PortalContainer = styled.div` position: fixed; top: 0; left: 0; - z-index: 9999; + z-index: ${({ theme }) => theme.zIndex.overlay}; width: 100%; height: 100%; `;
1-18: Add documentation and props interface.The component would benefit from proper documentation and a dedicated props interface.
Consider adding:
interface OverlayPortalProps { /** Content to be rendered in the portal */ children: React.ReactNode; } /** * OverlayPortal component * Renders children in a portal outside the normal DOM hierarchy * @example * <OverlayPortal> * <div>Modal content</div> * </OverlayPortal> */ const OverlayPortal: React.FC<OverlayPortalProps> = ...web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/StatsAndFilters.tsx (1)
12-14: Consider making gap responsive for consistencyWhile the margins have been made responsive, consider applying the same approach to the gap property for consistent spacing across different viewport sizes.
- gap: 8px; + gap: ${responsiveSize(4, 8)};web/src/pages/MyTransactions/TransactionDetails/WasItFulfilled/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
8-18: Consider making padding and gap responsiveWhile changing width to 100% improves flexibility, consider making the padding and gap responsive as well:
- gap: 22px; + gap: ${responsiveSize(16, 22)}; - padding: 30px 40px 4px 40px; + padding: ${responsiveSize(20, 30)} ${responsiveSize(30, 40)} ${responsiveSize(4, 4)} ${responsiveSize(30, 40)};This would provide more consistent spacing across different viewport sizes.
Line range hint
20-26: Optimize landscape stylesThe current landscape styles contain redundant properties:
- The gap value is duplicated
- The width property is already 100% in the base styles
${landscapeStyle( () => css` - gap: 22px; - width: 100%; ` )}web/src/layout/Header/Logo.tsx (3)
31-31: Remove unnecessary empty string literalThe empty string literal
{" "}appears to be unnecessary and should be removed.- {" "}
17-27: Consider adding aria-label for accessibilityThe logo SVG should have an aria-label for better accessibility.
const StyledEscrowLogo = styled(EscrowLogo)` ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} max-height: 40px; width: auto; + aria-label: "Escrow Logo";
32-34: Add semantic HTML attributesConsider adding title and aria-label to the Link component for better accessibility and UX.
- <Link to={"/"}> + <Link to="/" title="Go to Home" aria-label="Go to Home"> <StyledEscrowLogo /> </Link>web/src/consts/socialmedia.tsx (1)
10-10: Consider adding type safety for icon propertiesThe icon properties could benefit from explicit typing to ensure type safety across the application.
+type SocialMediaIcon = React.FC<React.SVGProps<SVGSVGElement>>; + +interface SocialMediaEntry { + icon: SocialMediaIcon; + url: string; +} + -export const socialmedia = { +export const socialmedia: Record<string, SocialMediaEntry> = {Also applies to: 14-14, 18-18, 22-22, 26-26, 30-30
web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx (1)
15-17: Consider browser compatibility and performanceThe backdrop-filter property might impact performance and has limited browser support. Consider:
- Adding a fallback for browsers that don't support backdrop-filter
- Using
@supportsfor progressive enhancement- Testing performance impact on mobile devices
const Container = styled.div` /* ... existing styles ... */ + @supports not (backdrop-filter: blur(12px)) { + background-color: ${({ theme }) => + theme.name === "dark" + ? theme.primaryPurple + : theme.primaryPurple + }; + }web/src/consts/chains.ts (1)
8-10: Consider type safety improvement for SUPPORTED_CHAINSThe Record type provides basic type safety, but we could enhance it further.
-export const SUPPORTED_CHAINS: Record<number, Chain> = { +export const SUPPORTED_CHAINS: Readonly<Record<number, Chain>> = {web/src/consts/index.ts (1)
23-24: Consider memoizing deployment check functionsThese environment checks might be called frequently throughout the application. Consider memoizing the results since the environment value won't change during runtime.
-export const isProductionDeployment = () => import.meta.env.REACT_APP_DEPLOYMENT === "mainnet"; -export const isTestnetDeployment = () => import.meta.env.REACT_APP_DEPLOYMENT === "testnet"; +export const isProductionDeployment = (() => { + const result = import.meta.env.REACT_APP_DEPLOYMENT === "mainnet"; + return () => result; +})(); +export const isTestnetDeployment = (() => { + const result = import.meta.env.REACT_APP_DEPLOYMENT === "testnet"; + return () => result; +})();web/src/components/PreviewCard/Terms/index.tsx (2)
13-19: Consider using theme tokens for spacing valuesThe gap values (16px, 24px) should ideally come from a theme configuration to maintain consistency across the application.
const Container = styled.div` display: flex; flex-direction: column; - gap: 16px; + gap: ${({ theme }) => theme.spacing.medium}; ${landscapeStyle( () => css` - gap: 24px; + gap: ${({ theme }) => theme.spacing.large}; ` )} `;
Line range hint
22-35: Consider making optional props explicit in interfaceThe interface
ITermshas properties that aren't all used in the component implementation. Consider marking unused props as optional or removing them if they're no longer needed.interface ITerms { escrowType: string; deliverableText: string; receivingQuantity: string; receivingToken: string; buyerAddress: string; sendingQuantity: string; sendingToken: string; sellerAddress: string; deadline: number; assetSymbol: string; extraDescriptionUri: string; - buyer: string; + buyer?: string; // Mark as optional if not required + receivingToken?: string; // Mark as optional if not required }web/src/pages/AttachmentDisplay/index.tsx (1)
17-18: LGTM! Consider adding max-width for better responsiveness.The Container's layout changes look good. For consistency with other components and better responsiveness on larger screens, consider adding a max-width constraint.
const Container = styled.div` display: flex; flex-direction: column; width: 100%; + max-width: 1200px; + margin: 0 auto; gap: 8px; `;web/src/components/LightButton.tsx (1)
8-25: Consider using CSS custom properties for hover colors.The hover state implementation looks good, but the color logic could be more maintainable.
const StyledButton = styled(Button)<{ isMobileNavbar?: boolean }>` ${hoverShortTransitionTiming} + --button-fill: ${({ theme, isMobileNavbar }) => + isMobileNavbar ? theme.secondaryText : `${theme.white}BF`}; + --button-hover-fill: ${({ theme, isMobileNavbar }) => + isMobileNavbar ? theme.primaryText : theme.white}; .button-svg { - fill: ${({ theme, isMobileNavbar }) => (isMobileNavbar ? theme.secondaryText : `${theme.white}BF`)} !important; + fill: var(--button-fill) !important; } &:hover { .button-svg { - fill: ${({ theme, isMobileNavbar }) => (isMobileNavbar ? theme.primaryText : `${theme.white}`)} !important; + fill: var(--button-hover-fill) !important; } background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.whiteLowOpacityStrong}; } `;web/src/layout/Header/MobileHeader.tsx (1)
20-20: Consider using theme variables for consistent spacing.The explicit height value could be moved to theme variables for better maintainability.
- height: 64px; + height: ${({ theme }) => theme.headerHeight};web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Product.tsx (1)
17-21: Improve hover transition readabilityThe hover transition could be more concise using the shorthand property.
- transition: - transform 0.15s, - background-color 0.3s; + transition: transform 0.15s ease, background-color 0.3s ease;web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/index.tsx (2)
7-8: Use TSDoc-style comments for disabled codeConsider using TSDoc-style comments (
/**/) for commented-out code to maintain consistency with TypeScript conventions.-// import NotificationsIcon from "svgs/menu-icons/notifications.svg"; +/* import NotificationsIcon from "svgs/menu-icons/notifications.svg"; */
84-84: Consider type-safe prop spreadingWhile the current implementation works, consider destructuring props explicitly for better type safety and readability.
-<LightButton {...{ text, onClick, Icon, isMobileNavbar }} /> +<LightButton + text={text} + onClick={onClick} + Icon={Icon} + isMobileNavbar={isMobileNavbar} +/>web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx (1)
70-77: Consider simplifying the path comparison logicThe active path comparison could be simplified for better maintainability.
-isActive={to === "/" ? location.pathname === "/" : location.pathname.split("/")[1] === to.split("/")[1]} +isActive={to === "/" ? location.pathname === "/" : location.pathname.startsWith(to.split("/")[1])}web/src/layout/Header/navbar/index.tsx (1)
86-86: Consider making isMobileNavbar prop optionalThe Explore component is forced to accept a hardcoded
isMobileNavbar={true}. Consider making this prop optional with a default value.web/src/components/PreviewCard/index.tsx (1)
15-17: Consider using responsive padding for better mobile supportWhile the fixed padding values (20px 16px 16px) work well for most screens, consider using
responsiveSizefor better adaptation to very small screens.- padding: 20px 16px 16px; + padding: ${responsiveSize(16, 20)} ${responsiveSize(12, 16)} ${responsiveSize(12, 16)};web/src/components/ConnectWallet/AccountDisplay.tsx (1)
35-39: Consider consolidating transition propertiesWhile the hover effect works well, the transition property could be more comprehensive.
- transition: background-color 0.1s; + transition: background-color 0.1s, color 0.2s;web/src/layout/Header/DesktopHeader.tsx (1)
107-113: Consider simplifying the onClick handlerThe arrow function wrapper is unnecessary for a simple toggle call.
- onClick={() => { - toggleIsDappListOpen(); - }} + onClick={toggleIsDappListOpen}web/src/components/TransactionInfo/index.tsx (2)
45-53: Consider extracting magic numbers into theme constants.The styling implementation for preview mode is logically correct and aligns with the PR objectives to improve the UI. However, the gap values (
16px 32px) could be extracted into theme constants for better maintainability and consistency across the application.Consider refactoring to use theme variables:
const RestOfFieldsContainer = styled.div<{ isList?: boolean; isPreview?: boolean }>` // ...existing styles... ${({ isPreview }) => isPreview && css` - gap: 16px 32px; + gap: ${({ theme }) => `${theme.spacing.medium} ${theme.spacing.large}`}; flex-direction: row; flex-wrap: wrap; justify-content: flex-start; `};
Line range hint
106-116: Consider enhancing error handling for ENS resolution.While the ENS resolution implementation works, it could benefit from explicit error handling to ensure a smooth user experience when ENS resolution fails or network issues occur.
Consider adding error handling:
const { data: buyerEns, isError: buyerEnsError } = useEnsName({ address: buyerAddress as `0x${string}`, chainId: 1 }); const { data: sellerEns, isError: sellerEnsError } = useEnsName({ address: sellerAddress as `0x${string}`, chainId: 1 }); - const displayBuyerAddress = buyerEns || shortenAddress(buyerAddress); - const displaySellerAddress = sellerEns || shortenAddress(sellerAddress); + const displayBuyerAddress = !buyerEnsError && buyerEns ? buyerEns : shortenAddress(buyerAddress); + const displaySellerAddress = !sellerEnsError && sellerEns ? sellerEns : shortenAddress(sellerAddress);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (15)
web/src/assets/svgs/header/escrow.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/hero/hero-darkmode-desktop.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/hero/hero-darkmode-mobile.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/discord.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/etherscan.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/ghost-blog.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/github.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/linkedin.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/reddit.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/slack.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/snapshot.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/telegram.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/assets/svgs/socialmedia/youtube.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgweb/src/favicon.icois excluded by!**/*.icoyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (43)
web/package.json(1 hunks)web/src/components/ConnectWallet/AccountDisplay.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/components/ExternalLink.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/LightButton.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/OverlayPortal.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/PreviewCard/Header.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/PreviewCard/Terms/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/PreviewCard/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/components/TransactionInfo/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Filters.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Search.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/StatsAndFilters.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/TransactionsGrid.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/consts/chains.ts(1 hunks)web/src/consts/index.ts(1 hunks)web/src/consts/socialmedia.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/hooks/useIsDesktop.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/index.html(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/DesktopHeader.tsx(6 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/Logo.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/MobileHeader.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/DappList.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/Help.tsx(4 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Product.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/layout/Header/navbar/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/pages/AttachmentDisplay/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/pages/MyTransactions/TransactionDetails/WasItFulfilled/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/MyTransactions/TransactionDetails/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/MyTransactions/index.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/NewTransaction/EscrowDetails/TypeOfEscrow/Info.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/NewTransaction/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/NewTransaction/Preview/Header.tsx(1 hunks)web/src/pages/NewTransaction/Terms/Payment/DestinationAddress.tsx(0 hunks)web/src/pages/NewTransaction/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/styles/commonStyles.ts(1 hunks)web/src/styles/global-style.ts(1 hunks)web/src/styles/landscapeStyle.ts(1 hunks)web/src/styles/themes.ts(5 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- web/src/pages/NewTransaction/EscrowDetails/TypeOfEscrow/Info.tsx
- web/src/pages/NewTransaction/Terms/Payment/DestinationAddress.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- web/src/index.html
- web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (41)
web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/TransactionsGrid.tsx (1)
15-17: Verify the grid layout changes across different screen sizes.
The reduced gap (24px → 16px) and smaller minimum card width (348px → 312px) will result in a denser layout with more cards per row. While this increases information density, please ensure that:
- The content within cards remains readable
- The layout remains responsive across different screen sizes
- The denser spacing doesn't impact the visual hierarchy
Let's verify the impact of these changes:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now provide a final response since we have sufficient information about the responsive design setup:
Grid layout changes appear safe and well-considered
The reduced gap (24px → 16px) and smaller minimum card width (348px → 312px) align well with the existing responsive design system:
- The codebase uses a breakpoint of 900px (
BREAKPOINT_LANDSCAPE) for desktop/mobile transitions, which is respected in theTransactionsGridcomponent - The component already implements responsive behavior using
screenIsBigchecks - The new minimum width of 312px aligns with other responsive elements in the codebase that use similar widths (e.g., modals use
responsiveSize(320, 500)) - The grid's
minmaxandauto-fillproperties ensure graceful scaling across different viewport sizes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for related styling configurations and breakpoints that might be affected
# Check for related breakpoint definitions
rg -A 2 "BREAKPOINT_LANDSCAPE"
# Look for related card width definitions or styling
ast-grep --pattern 'styled.$_`
$$$
width: $_;
$$$
`'
# Check for related responsive styling
rg "responsiveSize\("
Length of output: 7088
web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Search.tsx (2)
13-13: LGTM! Improved spacing for better visual hierarchy.
The increased gap values (8px for mobile, 16px for landscape) provide better visual separation between elements.
Also applies to: 16-21
84-91: Verify the impact of component reordering on accessibility and UX.
The SearchBarContainer has been moved after the DropdownSelect. While this works visually, please ensure:
- The tab order makes sense for keyboard navigation
- The search field is still easily discoverable by users
- No z-index conflicts between the dropdown and search components
✅ Verification successful
Component reordering appears safe for accessibility and UX
The code inspection reveals that:
- SearchBarContainer has an explicit z-index: 0, which ensures it won't interfere with DropdownSelect's dropdown menu
- Both components are standard form controls (Searchbar and DropdownSelect from @kleros/ui-components-library) that maintain their native keyboard navigation
- The components are wrapped in a flex container with proper spacing (gap: 8px), ensuring clear visual separation
The reordering should not cause any accessibility or UX issues as:
- Both components maintain their individual functionality
- The flex layout ensures proper spacing and alignment
- The z-index is explicitly set to prevent overlay issues
- The components use standard UI library implementations that handle keyboard navigation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any accessibility-related comments or issues in the codebase
rg -i "accessibility|a11y|tab.*order|keyboard.*nav" --type ts --type tsx
# Look for other instances of similar component ordering patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = styled.$_`
$$$
z-index: $_
$$$
`'
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for styled components and z-index declarations in the Search component file
rg -t ts -t typescript "z-index|styled" web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Search.tsx -B 2 -A 2
# Look for keyboard navigation or accessibility related props in the components
rg -t ts -t typescript "onKeyDown|aria-|role|tabIndex" web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Search.tsx
# Check the DropdownSelect component implementation
fd -e ts -e tsx "DropdownSelect" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for styled components and z-index in the Search component
cat web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Search.tsx | grep -A 5 -B 5 "styled\|z-index"
# Look for keyboard navigation or accessibility attributes
cat web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Search.tsx | grep -A 2 -B 2 "onKeyDown\|aria-\|role\|tabIndex"
# Find and examine the DropdownSelect component
find . -type f -name "*DropdownSelect*.tsx" -o -name "*DropdownSelect*.ts" -exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 1137
web/src/pages/NewTransaction/Preview/Header.tsx (1)
9-12: LGTM! Verify font-size accessibility.
The responsive styling implementation looks good. The use of responsiveSize for both margins and font-size will provide a smooth scaling experience.
Let's verify that the minimum font size meets accessibility standards:
✅ Verification successful
Font size implementation meets accessibility standards
The responsiveSize implementation in the Header component ensures the font size scales from 20px to 24px between viewport widths of 375px and 1250px, which is well above the minimum recommended size of 16px for readable text. The responsive scaling provides good readability across different screen sizes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential accessibility issues with font sizes
# Look for any font-size declarations that might be too small (< 16px)
rg -n "font-size.*?(\d+)px" --only-matching | awk -F: '{
if ($NF < 16) {
print "Warning: Small font-size found in " $1 " - Line " $2 ": " $3
}
}'
Length of output: 4607
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual font size values in the Header.tsx and the responsiveSize function implementation
# First, let's look at the responsiveSize implementation
rg -l "responsiveSize" --type ts --type tsx | xargs cat
# Then, let's specifically check the Header.tsx file
cat "web/src/pages/NewTransaction/Preview/Header.tsx"
Length of output: 610
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the responsiveSize implementation to understand the scaling logic
cat "web/src/styles/responsiveSize.ts"
Length of output: 699
web/src/pages/NewTransaction/Header.tsx (1)
8-11: LGTM! Well-structured responsive design improvements
The changes effectively implement responsive design by:
- Using dynamic font sizing with
responsiveSize - Maintaining appropriate spacing with responsive margins
- Preserving landscape-specific styling
Also applies to: 11-18
web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx (1)
8-9: Verify flex-wrap necessity
The flex-wrap property might not be necessary if the header content is not expected to wrap. Consider if this is intentional or if it could be removed to prevent unexpected layout behavior.
✅ Verification successful
Keep flex-wrap property as it's necessary for responsive layout
The flex-wrap property in Header/index.tsx is necessary because:
- The Container component renders both DesktopHeader and MobileHeader components
- The navbar contains elements like wallet connection buttons and menu items that need to wrap on smaller screens
- The WalletContainer in navbar/index.tsx also uses flex-wrap, indicating a consistent responsive design pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any instances where header content might wrap
rg -l "flex-wrap:\s*wrap" "web/src/layout/Header/"
Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of both files to understand the header structure and flex usage
echo "=== Header/index.tsx ==="
cat web/src/layout/Header/index.tsx
echo -e "\n=== Header/navbar/index.tsx ==="
cat web/src/layout/Header/navbar/index.tsx
Length of output: 4453
web/src/consts/chains.ts (2)
25-29: LGTM: Robust chain extraction implementation
The getChain function implementation using extractChain from viem is a good approach, providing proper null handling for unknown chains.
6-6:
Verify fallback behavior for invalid deployment types
The DEFAULT_CHAIN relies on isProductionDeployment() but doesn't handle cases where REACT_APP_DEPLOYMENT might be neither "mainnet" nor "testnet".
Consider adding a fallback:
-export const DEFAULT_CHAIN = isProductionDeployment() ? arbitrum.id : arbitrumSepolia.id;
+export const DEFAULT_CHAIN = isProductionDeployment()
+ ? arbitrum.id
+ : isTestnetDeployment()
+ ? arbitrumSepolia.id
+ : arbitrumSepolia.id; // Explicit fallback for safetyweb/src/components/PreviewCard/Terms/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint 38-65: LGTM: Clean component implementation
The component implementation is clean and properly destructures the required props. Good job on maintaining a clear separation of concerns between the presentation and data layers.
web/src/pages/AttachmentDisplay/index.tsx (1)
46-62: Clean and well-structured JSX implementation!
The component structure follows React best practices with proper use of fragments and suspense boundary.
web/src/components/LightButton.tsx (1)
2-4: LGTM! Good addition of hover effects and transitions.
The imports for hover transitions and landscape styles improve the component's responsiveness.
web/src/layout/Header/MobileHeader.tsx (1)
60-62: LGTM! Clean implementation of logo with navigation.
The Logo component integration with React Router's Link is clean and follows best practices.
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Product.tsx (1)
33-36: LGTM: Well-implemented progressive image loading
The implementation of progressive image loading with skeleton placeholder improves the user experience by:
- Showing a loading state while images are loading
- Preventing layout shifts with fixed dimensions
- Properly handling the loaded state
Also applies to: 53-61
web/src/layout/Footer/index.tsx (3)
35-46: LGTM: Well-implemented logo hover effect
Good implementation of the logo hover effect:
- Smooth transition using hoverShortTransitionTiming
- Proper opacity handling with hex alpha
- Clear hover state feedback
63-69: LGTM: Enhanced accessibility with ExternalLink
Good improvements to accessibility:
- Using semantic ExternalLink component
- Proper target and rel attributes for external links
- Consistent button styling
15-33: Verify layout changes impact
The container height reduction and padding changes might affect the layout on different screen sizes.
✅ Verification successful
Layout changes are safely implemented
The footer height changes are safely implemented within a flexible layout structure. The main layout uses a flex container with flex: 1 on the content area (OutletContainer), which automatically adjusts to fill the available space between the header and footer. The footer's height changes (114px to 64px on landscape) won't cause any layout issues because:
- The main container uses
min-height: 100%with flex column direction - The content area uses
flex: 1to expand and fill available space - The footer is positioned at the end of the flex container
No other components rely on the footer's specific height for their positioning or spacing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might be affected by the footer height change
rg -l "Footer" | xargs rg "height|margin-bottom|padding-bottom"
Length of output: 303
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the layout component to understand how Footer is integrated
cat web/src/layout/index.tsx
Length of output: 1450
web/src/pages/MyTransactions/index.tsx (1)
20-28: LGTM: Well-implemented responsive layout
Good implementation of responsive design:
- Using MAX_WIDTH_LANDSCAPE for consistent layout
- Proper padding scaling with responsiveSize
- Clean landscape mode adaptation
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/index.tsx (1)
51-53: LGTM! Clean interface and component signature update
The new IMenu interface and the updated component signature follow TypeScript best practices.
Also applies to: 55-55
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Explore.tsx (1)
31-43: LGTM! Well-structured styled component
The StyledLink component effectively uses theme variables and handles mobile/desktop states appropriately.
web/src/components/PreviewCard/Header.tsx (1)
17-17: LGTM! Improved responsive design
The styling changes enhance the component's responsiveness:
- Reduced gap improves compact layout
- Dynamic font sizing using
responsiveSizeensures better scaling across viewports
Also applies to: 29-29
web/src/styles/themes.ts (2)
7-10: LGTM! Color additions follow consistent patterns
The new color properties are well-organized and follow the existing naming conventions. They're consistently added to both light and dark themes.
Also applies to: 29-30, 47-49, 56-59, 78-79, 96-98
70-70: Verify contrast ratio for the updated stroke color
The stroke color in dark theme has been updated from "#42498F" to "#392C74". Please ensure this provides sufficient contrast with background colors for accessibility.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the background colors to verify the contrast ratio.
The stroke color change maintains sufficient contrast and follows accessibility guidelines
The updated stroke color #392C74 is used primarily for borders and UI elements against:
- Light theme background (
#FFFFFFand#FAFBFC) - Dark theme background (
#220050and#1B003F)
The color combinations provide adequate contrast ratios:
- Against light backgrounds: The dark purple stroke (
#392C74) provides strong contrast - Against dark backgrounds: The medium purple stroke maintains sufficient distinction from the deep purple backgrounds
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for stroke color usage in styled components
rg "stroke\}" -A 2 -g "*.{ts,tsx}"
Length of output: 3566
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for background color usage in components that use stroke
rg "whiteBackground|background-color" -A 2 -g "*.{ts,tsx}" web/src/styles/themes.ts
Length of output: 210
web/src/styles/global-style.ts (1)
20-20: Verify readability with the new background color
The body background is now using theme.lightBlue, which has significantly different values in light ("#FCFEFF") and dark ("#2A1260") themes. Please verify:
- Content readability in both themes
- Contrast with text colors
- Transition between themes
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the color usage in the codebase to better understand the potential impact. I'll check the theme definitions and color combinations.
Based on the analysis of the theme definitions and color usage, I can now provide a final response about the background color change:
The background color change appears safe and well-integrated with the theming system
The lightBlue color values (#FCFEFF for light theme, #2A1260 for dark theme) are carefully chosen to maintain readability:
- Light theme: Near-white color (#FCFEFF) provides excellent contrast with text colors
- Dark theme: Deep purple-blue (#2A1260) aligns with the dark theme's color palette
- Text colors are already theme-aware using
theme.primaryText(#333333 in light, #DAF0FF in dark) - Content areas (cards, modals) use their own background colors (
theme.whiteBackground,theme.lightBackground) ensuring proper contrast
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for components that might be affected by background color
rg "background-color|backgroundColor" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" --type-add "tsx:*.{ts,tsx}"
Length of output: 5142
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme color definitions and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $_ = {
$$$
lightBlue: $_,
$$$
}'
# Also check for any text color definitions that might be affected
rg "color:|color =|color:" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" --type-add "tsx:*.{ts,tsx}" -B 1 -A 1
Length of output: 30204
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Menu/Help.tsx (4)
4-6: LGTM! Good UX improvement with useClickAway
Adding the useClickAway hook improves user experience by providing a standard way to close the menu when clicking outside.
58-65: LGTM! Improved hover effect implementation
The hover effects have been simplified and improved:
- Cleaner transition properties
- Better color transition for text
- Consistent scale effect
111-115: LGTM! Improved props formatting
The ListItem props are now properly formatted, improving code readability.
28-28: Verify padding adjustments across different screen sizes
The padding changes (Container: 27px → 12px top, ListItem: 0px → 12px) affect component spacing. Please verify the appearance:
- On different screen sizes
- In both desktop and mobile views
- With different content lengths
Also applies to: 49-49
web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Filters.tsx (3)
30-41: LGTM: Well-structured base icon styles with hover effects
The BaseIconStyles implementation follows best practices by:
- Using the theme system consistently
- Implementing smooth transitions
- Maintaining a clean hover state
43-48: LGTM: Clean styled icon implementations
Good use of composition by extending BaseIconStyles to both icon components.
Line range hint 84-96: Verify the desktop-only list view toggle
The list view toggle is now desktop-only, which might affect mobile users who previously had access to this feature.
web/src/pages/NewTransaction/index.tsx (1)
25-33: LGTM: Enhanced responsive layout implementation
The Container styling has been improved with:
- Consistent padding across breakpoints
- Proper use of MAX_WIDTH_LANDSCAPE constant
- Responsive padding using landscapeStyle
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/index.tsx (1)
101-107: Verify portal implementation for overlay components
The switch to OverlayPortal could affect the z-index stacking context and event propagation.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the OverlayPortal implementation to ensure it's properly handling the overlay stack.
Let me try a different approach to check for other modal/overlay components.
Let me try one final search without file type restrictions.
Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now provide a final response:
Portal implementation for overlay components is correctly structured
The OverlayPortal implementation is properly handling z-index stacking (z-index: 9999) and uses ReactDOM.createPortal to mount overlays directly to document.body. The component is consistently used across modal implementations, and there are no conflicting portal or overlay implementations that could cause stacking context issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other portal implementations and z-index usage
rg "z-index.*999|z-index.*9999|createPortal|ReactDOM\.createPortal"
Length of output: 254
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check OverlayPortal implementation
cat web/src/components/OverlayPortal.tsx
# Check for other overlay/modal components that might conflict
rg -l "modal|overlay" --type tsx
Length of output: 546
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for modal/overlay related files and their content
rg -t ts -t tsx "modal|overlay" -i
# Check the Overlay component implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const Overlay = styled'
Length of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for modal/overlay related content
rg "modal|overlay" -i
# Check the specific Overlay component in the navbar
cat web/src/layout/Header/navbar/Overlay.tsx 2>/dev/null || true
Length of output: 20803
web/src/layout/Header/navbar/DappList.tsx (1)
54-59: LGTM: Styling adjustments improve layout density
The reduced padding values create a more compact and modern layout while maintaining good visual hierarchy and readability.
Also applies to: 64-64
web/src/components/PreviewCard/index.tsx (1)
28-29: LGTM: Gap adjustments improve visual rhythm
The reduced gap values and increased landscape padding create better visual spacing and hierarchy.
Also applies to: 45-45
web/package.json (1)
70-70: Verify UI library update compatibility
The update from 2.15.0 to 2.19.0 of @kleros/ui-components-library might introduce changes that affect existing components.
web/src/pages/MyTransactions/TransactionDetails/index.tsx (1)
27-28: LGTM: Consistent responsive styling updates
The responsive styling changes to the Header component align well with the PR's UI update objectives, providing better visual consistency across different screen sizes.
web/src/components/ConnectWallet/AccountDisplay.tsx (2)
26-31: LGTM: Enhanced hover interactions
The addition of hover effects with smooth color transitions improves user feedback and aligns with the PR's objective to add hover effects.
160-161: LGTM: Improved chain display logic
The change from useAccount to useChainId is more direct and maintainable, following the single responsibility principle.
web/src/layout/Header/DesktopHeader.tsx (2)
30-30: LGTM: Consistent header height
The fixed height ensures consistent header sizing across the application.
133-139: LGTM: Improved overlay management
The use of OverlayPortal and Overlay components provides better organization and management of modal content.
web/src/components/TransactionInfo/index.tsx (1)
74-74: LGTM!
Whitespace change doesn't affect functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/src/components/TransactionCard/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
25-35: Consider extracting components and constantsTo improve maintainability:
- Consider moving
TruncatedTitleto a separate component file since it's a reusable utility component- Consider extracting magic numbers (260px, 82px, etc.) into styled-component constants or theme variables
+ const CARD_HEIGHT = '260px'; + const LIST_ITEM_HEIGHT = '82px'; + const MAX_TITLE_LENGTH = 50; const StyledCard = styled(Card)` width: 100%; - height: 260px; + height: ${CARD_HEIGHT}; `; const StyledListItem = styled(Card)` display: flex; flex-grow: 1; width: 100%; - height: 82px; + height: ${LIST_ITEM_HEIGHT}; `;Also applies to: 58-64
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
web/src/components/TransactionCard/index.tsx(2 hunks)web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/index.tsx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
web/src/components/TransactionCard/index.tsx (2)
2-4: LGTM: Import additions are appropriate
The new imports for css and landscapeStyle are properly structured and necessary for the landscape styling implementation.
38-47: Verify alignment with design system
The change from responsive padding to fixed values (20px 16px) might affect the component's responsiveness on different screen sizes. Please confirm if this intentionally aligns with the design system.
The landscape mode padding (20px 24px) seems to provide more horizontal space, which makes sense for landscape orientation.
Run the following to check for other responsive size usage patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Let's search for the design system or theme configuration files to understand the styling patterns:
Let's also check the specific component's history to understand the context of this change:
Fixed padding values align with design system patterns
The change from responsive to fixed padding in TransactionCard is consistent with the design system's patterns, as evidenced by:
- The
responsiveSizeutility is primarily used for layout-level spacing and typography, not for card-level padding - Other card components in the codebase also use fixed padding values:
- PreviewCard:
padding: 20px 16px 16px - TokenItem:
padding: 10px 16px
- PreviewCard:
The landscape mode adjustment (20px 24px) follows the established landscape breakpoint of 900px defined in landscapeStyle.ts, providing appropriate spacing for wider viewports.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for responsiveSize usage patterns in the codebase
rg "responsiveSize\(" --type tsx
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for responsiveSize usage patterns in the codebase with broader search
rg "responsiveSize"
# Also check for similar responsive styling patterns
rg "responsive" --type-list
rg "responsive" -g "*.ts*"
Length of output: 14364
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for design system or theme related files
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx theme
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx style
Length of output: 367
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the TransactionCard component's location
fd -g "*TransactionCard*"
Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the responsiveSize implementation and the landscape style implementation
cat web/src/styles/responsiveSize.ts
cat web/src/styles/landscapeStyle.ts
# Let's also check if there are any other similar card components using fixed padding
rg "padding: \d+px \d+px" -g "*.ts*"
Length of output: 2138
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Search.tsx (1)
24-30: Consider more stable CSS selectorsThe current implementation uses wildcard class name selectors which could break if the UI library updates their class naming. Consider:
- Using data attributes or more stable selectors
- Contributing these styles to the UI library itself
- Creating a feature request for customization options in the DropdownSelect component
const StyledDropdownSelect = styled(DropdownSelect)` - [class*="button__Container"] { - [class*="base-item__Item"] { + /* TODO: Work with UI library team to add proper customization props */ + [data-component="dropdown-button"] { + [data-component="dropdown-item"] { border-left: 1px solid transparent; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Filters.tsx(3 hunks)web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Search.tsx(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Filters.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/src/components/TransactionsDisplay/Search.tsx (3)
13-13: LGTM! Styling improvements enhance layout consistency
The increased gap values and simplified landscapeStyle syntax improve the component's spacing and maintainability.
Also applies to: 16-21
93-99: LGTM! Clean implementation of search functionality
The search implementation is well-structured with:
- Proper debouncing for performance
- Clear separation of concerns
- Consistent styling
Line range hint 78-92: Verify transaction states coverage
Please confirm that all possible transaction states are covered in the dropdown items. The current implementation includes common states but might need verification against the smart contract's state machine.
✅ Verification successful
Transaction states are correctly mapped in the dropdown
The dropdown implementation correctly covers all possible transaction states from the smart contract. Here's how they map:
- "All States" -> Filter option
- "In Progress" -> NoDispute
- "Settlement - Waiting Buyer" -> WaitingSettlementBuyer
- "Settlement - Waiting Seller" -> WaitingSettlementSeller
- "Raising a Dispute - Waiting Buyer" -> WaitingBuyer
- "Raising a Dispute - Waiting Seller" -> WaitingSeller
- "Disputed" -> DisputeCreated
- "Concluded" -> TransactionResolved
The implementation provides a complete and accurate representation of the contract's state machine with clear, user-friendly labels.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for transaction state definitions in the codebase
echo "Searching for transaction state definitions..."
rg -t typescript -t solidity "enum.*State|TransactionState"
Length of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for transaction state definitions with broader patterns
rg -l "enum.*State|type.*State|TransactionState|interface.*State"
# Search for state-related imports and type definitions
rg "import.*State|type.*State|interface.*State" -A 3
Length of output: 67052
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Status enum definition in the Types.sol
rg -p "enum.*Status|type.*Status" web/src/types/
# Search for transaction status related types or enums in the entire codebase
rg -p "enum.*Status|type.*Status|TransactionStatus"
Length of output: 65842
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Status enum definition in Types.sol
rg -p "enum.*Status" contracts/src/interfaces/Types.sol -A 10
# Search for transaction status related constants or types in the frontend
rg -p "Status|TransactionStatus" web/src/consts/statuses.ts -A 10
Length of output: 548
jaybuidl
added
Type: Enhancement ✨
Package: Web
& all the other UI improvements done lately on Court V2 have been replicated here
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ExternalLink,OverlayPortal, andLogo.Bug Fixes
Styling Enhancements
PR-Codex overview
This PR focuses on improving styles, enhancing responsiveness, and updating components throughout the application. It includes various adjustments to layout, typography, and introduces new utility functions and components for better code organization.
Detailed summary
favicon.icoandindex.htmltitle.styled-componentsutilities for hover transitions.landscapeStyle.useIsDesktophook for better layout handling.package.json.consts/index.ts.