-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
fix: make data property stricter
#327
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
It seems that the CI failure is unrelated to this change. |
|
I investigated this and it appears to be a regression in I tried addressing it but couldn't find a clear solution, so I opened an issue in the |
| }, | ||
| "dependencies": { | ||
| "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^1.22.0", | ||
| "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "1.22.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've pinned the version as a workaround for the CI failure.
(I tried using @ts-expect-error on the exact line where the error occurred, but it didn't work well.)
1789094 to
440b8c2
Compare
| "lint-staged": "^16.0.0", | ||
| "mocha": "^11.5.0", | ||
| "prettier": "^3.4.1", | ||
| "prettier": "^3.7.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Meanwhile, [email protected] was released 30 minutes ago and has also caused CI to fail.
Some additional code diffs were introduced by this change.
|
Marking it as a draft until #332 is merged. |
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
In this PR, I've resolved the issue metioned in #310.
I've updated the
dataproperty to acceptstring | number | boolean | bigint | null | undefinedand added test cases to ensure it works.What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
In this PR, I've resolved the issue metioned in #310.
Related Issues
Closes: #310
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
N/A