-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
First set of fixes to Dockerhub push action. #5747
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
First set of fixes to Dockerhub push action. #5747
Conversation
Since it's an external repository, and we are in the process of testing our submitting to dockerhub it makes sense to temporarily disable it to avoid spamming it with temporary/experimental PRs.
Without this the get_release_info action is failing as it doesn't have access to the github token that gives it access to repository metadata.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Disabling the homebrew PR isn't a "fix", but yes we should avoid spamming them.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #5747 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 69.55% 69.55%
========================================
Files 1243 1243
Lines 100793 100793
========================================
Hits 70108 70108
Misses 30685 30685
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ jobs: | |||
|
|||
|
|||
homebrew-pr: | |||
if: ${{ false }} # disable for now |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we please immediately have a PR that will re-enable this (once the PR is merged)? I am very worried about us forgetting about this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can do that immediately then if that eases your mind (even though it's on my personal todo list as a step after getting it working, so I wouldn't forget about it).
I'll submit a new PR reversing this and link to it here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay the new PR is available at #5748.
Please do not merge it yet - I'll merge it when the dockerhub image push is ready.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @NlightNFotis for creating the follow-up PR!
This PR contains two small fixes to the Dockerhub image push action we wrote:
everytime we make a new experimental release.
GITHUB_TOKEN
within the scope of the Dockerhub imagepush action so it can have access to metadata required (release version) to
name the docker image appropriately.