[Merged by Bors] - Remove App::add_sub_app #7290
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
james7132
added
A-App
hymm
reviewed
Jan 20, 2023
hymm
reviewed
Jan 23, 2023
Co-authored-by: Mike <[email protected]>
hymm
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2023
alice-i-cecile
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2023
alice-i-cecile
added
the
S-Ready-For-Final-Review
Member
|
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2023
# Objective Fixes #7286. Both `App::add_sub_app` and `App::insert_sub_app` are rather redundant. Before 0.10 is shipped, one of them should be removed. ## Solution Remove `App::add_sub_app` to prefer `App::insert_sub_app`. Also hid away `SubApp::extract` since that can be a footgun if someone mutates it for whatever reason. Willing to revert this change if there are objections. Perhaps we should make `SubApp: Deref<Target=App>`? Might change if we decide to move `!Send` resources into it. --- ## Changelog Added: `SubApp::new` Removed: `App::add_sub_app` ## Migration Guide `App::add_sub_app` has been removed in favor of `App::insert_sub_app`. Use `SubApp::new` and insert it via `App::add_sub_app` Old: ```rust let mut sub_app = App::new() // Build subapp here app.add_sub_app(MySubAppLabel, sub_app); ``` New: ```rust let mut sub_app = App::new() // Build subapp here app.insert_sub_app(MySubAppLabel, SubApp::new(sub_app, extract_fn)); ```
mockersf
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2023
Contributor
bors
bot
changed the title
JMS55
pushed a commit
to JMS55/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2023
# Objective Fixes bevyengine#7286. Both `App::add_sub_app` and `App::insert_sub_app` are rather redundant. Before 0.10 is shipped, one of them should be removed. ## Solution Remove `App::add_sub_app` to prefer `App::insert_sub_app`. Also hid away `SubApp::extract` since that can be a footgun if someone mutates it for whatever reason. Willing to revert this change if there are objections. Perhaps we should make `SubApp: Deref<Target=App>`? Might change if we decide to move `!Send` resources into it. --- ## Changelog Added: `SubApp::new` Removed: `App::add_sub_app` ## Migration Guide `App::add_sub_app` has been removed in favor of `App::insert_sub_app`. Use `SubApp::new` and insert it via `App::add_sub_app` Old: ```rust let mut sub_app = App::new() // Build subapp here app.add_sub_app(MySubAppLabel, sub_app); ``` New: ```rust let mut sub_app = App::new() // Build subapp here app.insert_sub_app(MySubAppLabel, SubApp::new(sub_app, extract_fn)); ```
ItsDoot
pushed a commit
to ItsDoot/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2023
# Objective Fixes bevyengine#7286. Both `App::add_sub_app` and `App::insert_sub_app` are rather redundant. Before 0.10 is shipped, one of them should be removed. ## Solution Remove `App::add_sub_app` to prefer `App::insert_sub_app`. Also hid away `SubApp::extract` since that can be a footgun if someone mutates it for whatever reason. Willing to revert this change if there are objections. Perhaps we should make `SubApp: Deref<Target=App>`? Might change if we decide to move `!Send` resources into it. --- ## Changelog Added: `SubApp::new` Removed: `App::add_sub_app` ## Migration Guide `App::add_sub_app` has been removed in favor of `App::insert_sub_app`. Use `SubApp::new` and insert it via `App::add_sub_app` Old: ```rust let mut sub_app = App::new() // Build subapp here app.add_sub_app(MySubAppLabel, sub_app); ``` New: ```rust let mut sub_app = App::new() // Build subapp here app.insert_sub_app(MySubAppLabel, SubApp::new(sub_app, extract_fn)); ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Objective
Fixes #7286. Both
App::add_sub_appandApp::insert_sub_appare rather redundant. Before 0.10 is shipped, one of them should be removed.Solution
Remove
App::add_sub_appto preferApp::insert_sub_app.Also hid away
SubApp::extractsince that can be a footgun if someone mutates it for whatever reason. Willing to revert this change if there are objections.Perhaps we should make
SubApp: Deref<Target=App>? Might change if we decide to move!Sendresources into it.Changelog
Added:
SubApp::newRemoved:
App::add_sub_appMigration Guide
App::add_sub_apphas been removed in favor ofApp::insert_sub_app. UseSubApp::newand insert it viaApp::add_sub_appOld:
New: