[ModelicaSystem] improve set functions #345
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* use a Pythonic way for input:
setParameters(a=123)
param = {'a': 123}
setParameters(**param)
see input by SengerM in PR OpenModelica#326
This was referenced Aug 15, 2025
|
@adeas31 one thing I did not checked but which is quite important to confirm here: are there the same rules for variable names in Python and OpenModelica? I assume yes and then all is fine - if not this PR should not be applied! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
improve input handling for set*() functions
Based on PR #314 with input from SengerM (see PR #326); this replaces PR #326