Skip to content

Conversation

@emyller
Copy link
Contributor

@emyller emyller commented Oct 2, 2025

Contributes to #98

This is pass 2 of 3.

  1. Implement get_evaluation_result + engine tests passing. No deleted code. (PR)
  2. Use the new engine in the client local evaluation. Minimal changes. (this PR)
  3. Delete unused code. Minimal refactor. (future PR)

Warning

CANNOT MERGE before #108 (pass 1).


The client work is largely inspired by flagsmith-python-client.

@emyller emyller requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2025 02:26
@emyller emyller requested review from khvn26 and removed request for a team October 2, 2025 02:26
@emyller emyller self-assigned this Oct 2, 2025
@emyller emyller changed the title WIP: First pass at using the new engine feat(Local evaluation): Use the new context-based engine Oct 2, 2025
@emyller emyller marked this pull request as draft October 2, 2025 02:32
@khvn26 khvn26 requested a review from gagantrivedi October 2, 2025 08:52
@emyller emyller requested a review from khvn26 October 16, 2025 18:14
khvn26

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Member

@khvn26 khvn26 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, one more comment from me to address.

@emyller emyller force-pushed the feat/context-values-client branch from c5015d7 to a75e860 Compare October 17, 2025 00:32
@emyller emyller requested a review from khvn26 October 17, 2025 00:50
khvn26
khvn26 previously approved these changes Oct 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@khvn26 khvn26 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🥳

Base automatically changed from feat/context-values to main October 17, 2025 14:46
@emyller emyller dismissed khvn26’s stale review October 17, 2025 14:46

The base branch was changed.

@khvn26 khvn26 self-requested a review October 17, 2025 14:57
Copy link
Member

@khvn26 khvn26 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very cool.

@khvn26
Copy link
Member

khvn26 commented Oct 20, 2025

Created #111 to address @gagantrivedi's comments.

@khvn26 khvn26 merged commit 66435a6 into main Oct 20, 2025
3 checks passed
@khvn26 khvn26 deleted the feat/context-values-client branch October 20, 2025 13:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants