-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
Option to update the PR comment – improvements #42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Option to update the PR comment – improvements #42
Conversation
ef498d7 to
26ab5bf
Compare
|
Hi @bartosz347! Curious why you didn't simply contribute to the original PR #28? |
|
Hey @zgosalvez, that's what I've wanted to do at first, but I think I can't contribute to the existing PR – I'd have to push to its author's repository (I don't have RW access). Only maintainers are allowed to add new commits. Or maybe I'm wrong – please tell me how can I do this :) |
|
Not exactly, #28 has a return statement which omits |
df3091c to
767e21c
Compare
767e21c to
4956737
Compare
4956737 to
84680f0
Compare
|
Hey @zgosalvez looks like something's wrong with Build & Test pipeline, it can't check out code from fork. Would you be able to fix this and merge my PR? |
84680f0 to
bc0168d
Compare
|
Would love to see this addition and fixes for v3! |
|
Addressed in #85 🚀 |
Bumps [@biomejs/biome](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/tree/HEAD/packages/@biomejs/biome) from 1.8.1 to 1.8.2. - [Release notes](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/biomejs/biome/commits/cli/v1.8.2/packages/@biomejs/biome) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@biomejs/biome" dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
I've rebased the PR #28 created by @oacik and applied some improvements to properly handle
minimum-coveragecheck.I've tested the changes in a test repository – bartosz347/github-actions-flutter-workflows#1. The build is failing intentionally – to test minimum coverage requirement. I've tested the following scenarios:
update-comment: false(regression)In both 3. and 4. the comment bartosz347/github-actions-flutter-workflows#1 (comment) has been updated. In 5. new comment has been created.
If there's any better way to contribute to the previous PR, please let me know. Thanks @oacik for your work!