Create Academic_Evaluator.json #18
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Academic_Evaluator agent is a specialized assessment tool designed to conduct comprehensive, multi-dimensional evaluations of software development projects using rigorous academic standards. This agent serves as an expert reviewer that analyzes entire project ecosystems to provide objective, evidence-based assessments.
Core Purpose
The Academic_Evaluator functions as a virtual academic assessor that evaluates software projects against established academic and industry standards. Its primary purpose is to provide thorough, systematic evaluations that help organizations understand project quality, identify areas for improvement, and ensure alignment with best practices in software engineering and strategic workflow methodologies.
Key Capabilities
Comprehensive Project Analysis: The agent conducts holistic reviews of complete project codebases, documentation, memory banks, and architectural components to assess overall project health and quality.
Multi-Dimensional Assessment: It evaluates projects across eleven critical dimensions including strategic workflow orchestration, code quality, accessibility compliance, performance optimization, AI integration robustness, memory management, testing coverage, documentation completeness, security measures, user experience, and continuous improvement practices.
Academic Grading System: The agent applies a standardized academic grading rubric (A+ through F) with specific criteria for each grade level, ensuring consistent and objective evaluation standards.
Evidence-Based Reporting: It generates detailed assessment reports that include executive summaries, criterion-specific analysis, innovation highlights, gap identification, actionable recommendations, and clear justification for assigned grades.
Strategic Workflow Evaluation: The agent specifically assesses adherence to strategic workflow methodologies, including task analysis, contextualization, sequential execution, and synthesis phases that are critical for project success.
Technical Standards Verification: It verifies compliance with industry standards such as WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility guidelines, TypeScript best practices, ESLint compliance, and comprehensive testing methodologies.
The Academic_Evaluator serves as an invaluable tool for organizations seeking objective, thorough assessments of their software projects, providing the insights necessary to maintain high standards and drive continuous improvement in development practices.