Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 25, 2022

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pytest (changelog) ^7.1.2 -> ^7.1.3 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pytest-dev/pytest (pytest)

v7.1.3

Compare Source

pytest 7.1.3 (2022-08-31)

Bug Fixes

  • #​10060: When running with --pdb, TestCase.tearDown is no longer called for tests when the class has been skipped via unittest.skip or pytest.mark.skip.
  • #​10190: Invalid XML characters in setup or teardown error messages are now properly escaped for JUnit XML reports.
  • #​10230: Ignore .py files created by pyproject.toml-based editable builds introduced in pip 21.3.
  • #​3396: Doctests now respect the --import-mode flag.
  • #​9514: Type-annotate FixtureRequest.param as Any as a stop gap measure until 8073{.interpreted-text role="issue"} is fixed.
  • #​9791: Fixed a path handling code in rewrite.py that seems to work fine, but was incorrect and fails in some systems.
  • #​9917: Fixed string representation for pytest.approx{.interpreted-text role="func"} when used to compare tuples.

Improved Documentation

  • #​9937: Explicit note that tmpdir{.interpreted-text role="fixture"} fixture is discouraged in favour of tmp_path{.interpreted-text role="fixture"}.

Trivial/Internal Changes


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2022

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.03 ⚠️

Comparison is base (76b2d45) 97.95% compared to head (85ec848) 97.93%.

❗ Current head 85ec848 differs from pull request most recent head 87860ef. Consider uploading reports for the commit 87860ef to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #155      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.95%   97.93%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files           5        4       -1     
  Lines         147      145       -2     
==========================================
- Hits          144      142       -2     
  Misses          3        3              

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pytest-7.1.x branch 5 times, most recently from b7d47a7 to d4c0e05 Compare March 25, 2023 03:13
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pytest-7.1.x branch from d4c0e05 to 87860ef Compare April 12, 2023 06:12
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Aug 10, 2025

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: poetry.lock
Updating dependencies
Resolving dependencies...


Package codecov (2.1.12) not found.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pytest-7.1.x branch from 87860ef to 7142bcd Compare August 10, 2025 13:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants