Skip to content

docs(guides): clarify some caveats about dynamic import manual preloa… #5960

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

artem-malko
Copy link
Contributor

…d via script tag webpack/webpack/issues/14874

Add an explanation about an unexpected behavior of dynamic scripts from webpack/webpack#14874

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Feb 11, 2022

CLA Signed

The committers are authorized under a signed CLA.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 11, 2022

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/webpack-docs/webpack-js-org/GbYTcTGrajkmEaH3fPgU5SCvXVdW
✅ Preview: https://webpack-js-org-git-fork-artem-malko-explana-71d92d-webpack-docs.vercel.app

evenstensberg
evenstensberg previously approved these changes Feb 11, 2022
Copy link
Member

@evenstensberg evenstensberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay to me

@artem-malko
Copy link
Contributor Author

artem-malko commented Feb 11, 2022

@evenstensberg what does EasyCLA mean?

Never mind)

@alexander-akait
Copy link
Member

@webpack/documentation-team Somebody can review?

@artem-malko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thx @alexander-akait

@chenxsan chenxsan merged commit cbb2393 into webpack:master Feb 16, 2022
@artem-malko artem-malko deleted the explanation-for-webpack-issue-14874 branch February 16, 2022 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants