#466

[jspellman]

No description provided.

[bruce-usab]

I like this change! I think there may be a verb mismatch though.

Current:

The Guidelines motivate organizations to go beyond minimal accessibility requirements by structuring WCAG 3 to encourage organizations which demonstrate a greater effort to improve accessibility.

Proposed:

The Guidelines motivate organizations to go beyond minimal accessibility requirements by structuring WCAG 3 to provide encouragement to organizations which demonstrate a greater effort to improve accessibility.

I am not clear if which demonstrate a greater effort to improve accessibility applies to WCAG3 (itself) or to the organization which use WCAG3 (to guide the organization's efforts).

[jspellman]

I like your proposal and will fix the PR. Please don't approve it, though. It needs to go to survey before it is approved. We are working on the process, so it's a little confusing.

[bruce-usab]

It needs to go to survey before it is approved. We are working on the process, so it's a little confusing.

I had/have assumed the submit review feature ( comment / approve / request changes ) is more of a 0/+1/-1 feedback and not really related to AGWG approval and especially not PR approval. But (as you note) it is a little confusing, so I will stop doing that until there is clarification one way or the other. GitHub comment threads seem to be working pretty well, regardless of the approve/comment/disapprove feature.