Improve description of keyword aliases using @protected
#272
Conversation
…e to the grammar. For #246.
… id-map until that is addressed in the algorithm.
gkellogg
force-pushed
the
protected-keywords
branch
from
a056cd5 to
eaa444e
Compare
| @@ -12050,9 +12057,14 @@ <h2>Context Definitions</h2> | |||
| <code>@container</code>, | |||
| <code class="changed">@context</code>, | |||
| <code class="changed">@prefix</code>, | |||
| <code class="changed">@propagate</code>, or | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I did remove @propagate from this list earlier (b4dae4d), because I don't see anything the API where it is expected in an expanded term definition...
Am I missing something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, I you’re right, only a context definition can contain @propagate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, I you’re right, only a context definition can contain @propagate.
| @@ -12110,13 +12122,21 @@ <h2>Context Definitions</h2> | |||
| <p class="changed">If an <a>expanded term definition</a> has an <code>@context</code> <a>entry</a>, | |||
| it MUST be a valid <code>context definition</code>.</p> | |||
|
|
|||
| <p class="changed">If a <a>context</a> contains the <code>@import</code> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This whole paragraph is a copy of the one line 12017... Was the intent to replace "context" by "expanded term definition"?? That would be strange as @import can not appear in an expanded term definition...
| <p class="changed">If the <a>expanded term definition</a> contains the <code>@nest</code> | ||
| <a>keyword</a>, its value MUST be either <code>@nest</code>, or a term | ||
| which expands to <code>@nest</code>.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <p class="changed">If the <a>expanded term definition</a> contains the <code>@prefix</code> | ||
| <a>keyword</a>, its value MUST be <code>true</code> or <code>false</code>.</p> | ||
|
|
||
| <p class="changed">If the <a>expanded term definition</a> contains the <code>@propagate</code> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cf. my comment above, I don't think that an expanded term definition can contain the @propagate keyword...
and add more to the grammar.
For #246.
Preview | Diff