Skip to content

is the note warning of DPUB implementations still accurate? #546

@pkra

Description

@pkra

I recently saw a reference to

html-aria/index.html

Lines 498 to 501 in 1cf4fc1

<p class="note" id="dpub-usage-note">
While it is conforming to use [[[dpub-aria-1.0]]] `role` values as outlined in the following table, the current support for
exposing the semantics of these values to users of assistive technology is close to non-existent.
</p>

On the one hand, dpub 1.1 is nearing REC. On the other, "close to non-existent" seems a bit harsh these days.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions