Skip to content

Conversation

@matt-aitken
Copy link
Member

We didn’t call scheduleEnqueueRunsForBackgroundWorker in the right
place…

We didn’t call `scheduleEnqueueRunsForBackgroundWorker` in the right 
place…
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Aug 18, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 09f5cc8

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Walkthrough

  • Added imports: engine from ../runEngine.server and tryCatch from @trigger.dev/core.
  • In FinalizeDeploymentService.call, introduced conditional handling for V2 workers:
    • After emitting PRE_PULL_DEPLOYMENT and before enqueueing deployment alerts, if deployment.worker.engine === "V2", call engine.scheduleEnqueueRunsForBackgroundWorker(deployment.worker.id) within tryCatch.
    • On error, log via logger.error("Error scheduling pending versions", { error }) and continue without throwing.
  • No changes to public signatures.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch pending-version-fix

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts (2)

12-13: Avoid importing from root @trigger.dev/core in the webapp; replace tryCatch with native try/catch.

Per coding guidelines for apps/webapp, don’t import from the root @trigger.dev/core. Since this usage is a simple promise await, prefer native try/catch and drop the import.

Apply this diff to remove the root import:

 import { engine } from "../runEngine.server";
-import { tryCatch } from "@trigger.dev/core";

A corresponding change to the scheduling block is suggested in a separate comment below.


121-131: Use native try/catch for scheduling and add context to error logs.

Removes the guideline-violating import, simplifies flow, and enriches observability with identifiers.

-    if (deployment.worker.engine === "V2") {
-      const [schedulePendingVersionsError] = await tryCatch(
-        engine.scheduleEnqueueRunsForBackgroundWorker(deployment.worker.id)
-      );
-
-      if (schedulePendingVersionsError) {
-        logger.error("Error scheduling pending versions", {
-          error: schedulePendingVersionsError,
-        });
-      }
-    }
+    if (deployment.worker.engine === "V2") {
+      try {
+        await engine.scheduleEnqueueRunsForBackgroundWorker(deployment.worker.id);
+      } catch (error) {
+        logger.error("Error scheduling pending versions", {
+          error,
+          workerId: deployment.worker.id,
+          deploymentId: deployment.id,
+          environmentId: authenticatedEnv.id,
+        });
+      }
+    }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b35cc3 and 09f5cc8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
No default exports, use function declarations

Files:

  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts
{packages/core,apps/webapp}/**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

We use zod a lot in packages/core and in the webapp

Files:

  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts
apps/webapp/**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.cursor/rules/webapp.mdc)

apps/webapp/**/*.{ts,tsx}: In the webapp, all environment variables must be accessed through the env export of env.server.ts, instead of directly accessing process.env.
When importing from @trigger.dev/core in the webapp, never import from the root @trigger.dev/core path; always use one of the subpath exports as defined in the package's package.json.

Files:

  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts (2)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/createDeploymentBackgroundWorkerV4.server.ts (1)
  • deployment (182-200)
apps/webapp/app/v3/runEngine.server.ts (1)
  • engine (9-9)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (23)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/finalizeDeployment.server.ts (2)

121-131: No changes needed for tryCatch usage
The tryCatch utility is defined as an async function that accepts a Promise and returns [error, result]. Core tests in packages/core/test/utils.test.ts confirm its contract and tuple order. In finalizeDeployment.server.ts, you’re passing a Promise to tryCatch and only destructuring the error—this aligns perfectly with its intended use.


121-131: Engine gating is correct for existing versions
Our codebase only defines “V1” and “V2” as valid engine values—no “V4” literal or enum member is present. The if (deployment.worker.engine === "V2") block correctly targets the only background‐worker engine that supports scheduling pending versions today.
• If and when a “V4” engine is officially introduced, you’ll need to add its literal/enum and then extend this check accordingly.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

@matt-aitken matt-aitken merged commit 9dd831f into main Aug 18, 2025
31 checks passed
@matt-aitken matt-aitken deleted the pending-version-fix branch August 18, 2025 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants