Skip to content

Conversation

@lambdamoses
Copy link
Contributor

Address #80

@stemangiola
Copy link
Collaborator

Somehow your comment about refactoring disappeared, I must have clicked on something weird.

Regarding your refectory, I cannot figure out whether your factoring proposal would only decrease complexity or also increase complexity somehow. If it's not a lot of work for you to re-factor the code, can I please ask you to do so in a separate branch so we can evaluate whether to keep or reject the proposal?

On the other hand, if it's a lot of work, there might be other priorities beyond this.

@lambdamoses
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, it isn't a lot for work. It will decrease the complexity, since it's really one function behind all 4 join flavors. I'll do it in a branch in my fork of your repo. However, it might make debugging a bit more complicated.

@lambdamoses
Copy link
Contributor Author

Somehow your comment about refactoring disappeared, I must have clicked on something weird.

The comment is in the issue, not this pull request.

@lambdamoses
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stemangiola
Copy link
Collaborator

Amazing, if you feel you can tackle the same for tidySE it would be amazing so we keep the ecosystem consistent.

@stemangiola stemangiola merged commit 6d7414d into tidyomics:master Oct 19, 2023
@stemangiola stemangiola linked an issue Oct 19, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Method for S4 DataFrame for left_join

2 participants