-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
feat(all): update packages, tests, links #515
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
cb1kenobi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR is a great first step! Thanks for working on this.
| "sprintf": "^0.1.5", | ||
| "temp": "~0.9.4", | ||
| "uuid": "~8.3.2", | ||
| "uuid": "~9.0.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd have to test this, but I'm hesitant to blind merge a major bump.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
only tested it on Linux. btw: I don't see where it is used
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return cachedStatus = result; | ||
| exports.login = function login(_args) {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Elsewhere you had to put a comment in the body of a scope to I believe make lint happy. I'm curious why linting complained elsewhere, but not here? FWIW, I do prefer the empty body as you have it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer this too, even for the code blocks in an if or catch. We could add allowEmptyCatch to ignore this warning
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I say we add allowEmptyCatch (which I didn't know existed!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done 👍
cb1kenobi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
allowEmptyCatchrule to ignore empty blocks