Skip to content

Conversation

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

@antonbabenko antonbabenko commented Jun 19, 2025

Finally, I think upgrading the version to 6.0 everywhere in the module is good. :)

Copy link
Member

@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good - sorry, baby came the day after the new provider versions so its been a bit crazy 😅

@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs merged commit 26c99a5 into master Jun 20, 2025
20 checks passed
antonbabenko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
## [6.0.1](v6.0.0...v6.0.1) (2025-06-20)

### Bug Fixes

* Bump AWS provider requirement to v6 everywhere ([#1208](#1208)) ([26c99a5](26c99a5))
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member Author

This PR is included in version 6.0.1 🎉

@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member Author

looks good - sorry, baby came the day after the new provider versions so its been a bit crazy 😅

Priorities, my friend, priorities! Congratulations! 🎉

@Usinghal
Copy link

This is wrong please update it <=6.0 it trying to find version above 6.0 which is not there yet!

@bryantbiggs
Copy link
Member

working as intended #1212 (comment)

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 25, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants