Skip to content

Conversation

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member

Whenever we have a reference to a foreign function/variable in SIL, use a mangled name at the SIL level with the C name in the asmname attribute. The expands the use of asmname to three kinds of cases that it hadn't been used in yet:

  • Declarations imported from C headers/modules
  • @_cdecl @implementation and @c @implementation of C headers/modules
  • @_cdecl functions in general

Some code within the SIL pipeline makes assumptions that the C names of various runtime functions are reflected at the SIL level. For example, the linking of Embedded Swift runtime functions is done by-name, and some of those names refer to C functions (like swift_retain) and others refer to Swift functions that use @_silgen_name (like swift_getDefaultExecutor). Extend the serialized module format to include a table that maps from the asmname of functions/variables over to their mangled names, so we can look up functions by asmname if we want. These tables could also be used for checking for declarations
that conflict on their asmname in the future. Right now, we leave it up to LLVM or the linker to do the checking.

@_silgen_name is not affected by these changes, nor should it be: that hidden feature is specifically meant to affect the name at the SIL level.

The vast majority of test changes are SIL tests where we had expected to see the C/C++/Objective-C names in the tests for references to foreign entities, and now we see Swift mangled names (ending in To). The SIL declarations themselves will have a corresponding asmname. Notably, the IRGen tests have not changed, because we generate the same IR as before. It's only the modeling at the SIL level that has changed.

This ended up fixing a C++ interoperability bug where some bespoke mangling in the Clang importer had mangling conflicts that resulted in miscomputes of derived-to-base thunks.

This is the last SIL part of rdar://137014448; there is some deserializer work to do as well.

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

…eferences

Whenever we have a reference to a foreign function/variable in SIL, use
a mangled name at the SIL level with the C name in the asmname
attribute. The expands the use of asmname to three kinds of cases that
it hadn't been used in yet:

* Declarations imported from C headers/modules
* @_cdecl @implementation of C headers/modules
* @_cdecl functions in general

Some code within the SIL pipeline makes assumptions that the C names of
various runtime functions are reflected at the SIL level. For example,
the linking of Embedded Swift runtime functions is done by-name, and
some of those names refer to C functions (like `swift_retain`) and
others refer to Swift functions that use `@_silgen_name` (like
`swift_getDefaultExecutor`). Extend the serialized module format to
include a table that maps from the asmname of functions/variables over
to their mangled names, so we can look up functions by asmname if we
want. These tables could also be used for checking for declarations
that conflict on their asmname in the future. Right now, we leave it
up to LLVM or the linker to do the checking.

`@_silgen_name` is not affected by these changes, nor should it be:
that hidden feature is specifically meant to affect the name at the
SIL level.

The vast majority of test changes are SIL tests where we had expected
to see the C/C++/Objective-C names in the tests for references to
foreign entities, and now we see Swift mangled names (ending in To).
The SIL declarations themselves will have a corresponding asmname.

Notably, the IRGen tests have *not* changed, because we generally the
same IR as before. It's only the modeling at the SIL lever that has
changed.

Another part of rdar://137014448.
When creating a C++ method that thunks from a particular C++ derived
class to call a method on one of its base classes, we do some manual
name mangling. This name mangling did not properly capture all of the
aspects of the thunk, so it was prone to collisions.

In moving to SIL asmname, we got a different set of collisions from
the ones that existed previously. Expanding the mangling to account
for small differences (const or not) as well as the base class type
eliminates these collisions. Most of the test changes account for the
new mangling, but the member-inheritance test indicates that this
change fixes an existing miscompile as well.
@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@DougGregor DougGregor requested a review from rjmccall as a code owner October 31, 2025 17:54
@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test Linux

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test Windows

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

Source-compatibility failures were unrelated

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@DougGregor
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@DougGregor DougGregor merged commit ba507ab into swiftlang:main Nov 2, 2025
5 checks passed
@DougGregor DougGregor deleted the clang-decl-asmname branch November 2, 2025 03:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants