Skip to content

Conversation

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor

@slavapestov slavapestov commented May 12, 2020

We should use the source location of the call site, and not the enum
element declaration, otherwise we emit incorrect debug info.

Fixes rdar://problem/63067437.

We should use the source location of the call site, and not the enum
element declaration, otherwise we emit incorrect debug info.

Fixes <rdar://problem/63067437>.
@slavapestov slavapestov force-pushed the source-loc-enum-constructor branch from 28f9c30 to 23cbd7f Compare May 12, 2020 23:42
@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test

Copy link
Contributor

@adrian-prantl adrian-prantl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code change itself LGTM!

return .hasPayload(argument: 123)
}

// CHECK-NOT: enum_debuginfo_other.swift
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add any kind of positive check, too? Otherwise this will pass even if someone symlinks swiftc to /bin/true ...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I'm going to be super nit-picky about the test name, technically, this is a SILLocation, and pre-debuginfo :-)

@shahmishal
Copy link
Member

@swift-ci Please smoke test

@slavapestov slavapestov merged commit 9aa4433 into swiftlang:master May 13, 2020
beccadax added a commit to beccadax/swift that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2020
Tweak this test to only look for debug info references to the filename, not *any* reference to the filename.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants