Skip to content

Conversation

compnerd
Copy link
Member

When building non-MachO targets, there is no support for fat binaries.
As a result, the lipo target does nothing. Because we do not support
variant builds for ELF targets, this has not resulted in any issues.
However, the PE/COFF (Windows) target suppots multiple variants. In
such a case, the "lipo" target will copy a number of builds, leaving the
binary to be an arbitrary variant. Instead, prefer to always use the
architectural variant path. In place, create an empty target which
serves as a means of collecting dependencies.

Replace this paragraph with a description of your changes and rationale. Provide links to external references/discussions if appropriate.

Resolves SR-NNNN.

When building non-MachO targets, there is no support for fat binaries.
As a result, the lipo target does nothing.  Because we do not support
variant builds for ELF targets, this has not resulted in any issues.
However, the PE/COFF (Windows) target suppots multiple variants.  In
such a case, the "lipo" target will copy a number of builds, leaving the
binary to be an arbitrary variant.  Instead, prefer to always use the
architectural variant path.  In place, create an empty target which
serves as a means of collecting dependencies.
@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

compnerd commented Feb 3, 2018

@swift-ci please test

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

swift-ci commented Feb 3, 2018

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - 49d885e

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test Linux platform

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - 49d885e

@CodaFi
Copy link
Contributor

CodaFi commented Nov 18, 2019

@swift-ci please test

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - 49d885e

@shahmishal
Copy link
Member

Please update the base branch to main by Oct 5th otherwise the pull request will be closed automatically.

  • How to change the base branch: (Link)
  • More detail about the branch update: (Link)

@shahmishal shahmishal closed this Oct 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants