Skip to content

[6.2] Enable InlineArray type sugar #3126

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2025
Merged

[6.2] Enable InlineArray type sugar #3126

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 5, 2025

Conversation

hamishknight
Copy link
Contributor

@hamishknight hamishknight commented Jul 11, 2025 •
edited
Loading

6.2 cherry-pick of #3125

  • Explanation: Enables the type sugar for InlineArray as part of SE-0483
  • Scope: Affects parsing
  • Issue: rdar://155607927
  • Risk: Medium, enables parsing for a previously experimental feature, but is source compatible
  • Testing: Added tests to test suite
  • Reviewer: Alex Hoppen

@hamishknight
Enable InlineArray type sugar
6d10686 
Promote it from an experimental feature.

rdar://155607927
@hamishknight hamishknight requested review from bnbarham and hborla July 11, 2025 12:33
@hamishknight hamishknight requested a review from a team as a code owner July 11, 2025 12:33
@hamishknight hamishknight mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2025
Merged
@hamishknight
Copy link
Contributor Author

swiftlang/swift#82988

@swift-ci please test

@hamishknight hamishknight merged commit 21b3b45 into swiftlang:release/6.2 Aug 5, 2025
27 checks passed
@hamishknight hamishknight deleted the enable-inlinearray-sugar-6.2 branch August 5, 2025 21:21
@TTOzzi TTOzzi mentioned this pull request Aug 6, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hborla hborla hborla approved these changes

@bnbarham bnbarham Awaiting requested review from bnbarham

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@hamishknight @hborla