add(docs): migration guide from zep to supermemory #612

MaheshtheDev · 2025-12-07T03:27:04Z

add docs for Migration Guide from zep to supermemory

MaheshtheDev · 2025-12-07T03:27:21Z

add(docs): migration guide from zep to supermemory #612 👈 (View in Graphite)
main

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label Main to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

_{An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.} _{Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.}

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

claude · 2025-12-07T03:29:02Z

Code Review: Migration Guide from Zep to Supermemory

Overall Assessment

✅ Approve with minor suggestions

This is a well-structured migration guide that follows the established pattern from the existing Mem0 migration doc. The content is clear, comprehensive, and will be valuable for users migrating from Zep AI.

Code Quality ✅

Strengths

Consistent structure: Follows the same pattern as from-mem0.mdx, maintaining documentation consistency
Clear API mapping: The side-by-side comparison table and code examples make the migration path obvious
Comprehensive coverage: Includes session management, adding memories, searching, and listing operations
Good documentation practices: Uses MDX CodeGroup components properly for multi-language support

Style & Conventions

Adheres to the repository's documentation standards
Proper frontmatter metadata with title, description, and sidebarTitle
Consistent code block formatting

Potential Issues & Improvements

1. API Method Inconsistency ⚠️

Location: apps/docs/migration/from-zep.mdx:95 and apps/docs/migration/from-zep.mdx:206

There's an inconsistency in the search API usage:

Line 95 uses: client.search.execute()
The Mem0 guide (line 206) uses: client.memories.search()

Recommendation: Verify which is the correct API method. If both are valid, clarify when to use each. If one is deprecated, use only the current method.

# Which is correct?
results = client.search.execute({...})  # Used in this PR
# vs
results = client.memories.search({...})  # Used in from-mem0.mdx

2. TypeScript Examples Missing ⚠️

Location: Multiple sections (Adding Memories, Searching, Getting All Memories, Complete Example)

The guide only provides Python examples for the core API operations, but the installation section shows TypeScript is supported.

Recommendation: Add TypeScript examples to match the Mem0 guide's completeness. Example:

// Complete Example - TypeScript version
const results = await client.search.execute({
  q: "programming",
  containerTags: ["user_123"],
  limit: 3
});

3. Error Handling in Migration Script 💡

Location: apps/docs/migration/from-zep.mdx:180-189

The data migration example doesn't include error handling, which could be problematic for users migrating large datasets.

Recommendation: Add try-catch blocks:

# Import to Supermemory
for memory in zep_memories.memories:
    try:
        client.memories.add({
            "content": memory.content,
            "container_tags": [memory.session_id],
            "metadata": memory.metadata or {}
        })
        print(f"✅ Imported: {memory.content[:50]}...")
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"❌ Failed to import: {e}")

4. Async Processing Note Placement 💡

Location: apps/docs/migration/from-zep.mdx:172

The "Async processing" note is buried in the Important Notes section but is crucial for users to understand.

Recommendation: Add a callout box earlier in the document, perhaps after the first code example:

<Warning>
Documents process asynchronously in Supermemory. After adding a memory, it may take a moment before it appears in search results. Check the document status (queued → done) if needed.
</Warning>

Security Concerns ✅

No security issues identified
API key handling follows standard practices
No sensitive data exposed in examples

Performance Considerations ✅

Migration script is straightforward and appropriate for typical use cases
For large-scale migrations, consider adding:
- Batch processing with rate limiting
- Progress tracking
- Resume capability for interrupted migrations

Test Coverage

Not applicable - This is documentation only, no code changes to test.

Additional Suggestions

5. Response Structure Example 💡

The "Important Notes" section mentions that "Supermemory returns chunks with scores, not direct memory content" but doesn't show what this looks like.

Recommendation: Add a brief example of the response structure:

# Response structure
results = client.search.execute({...})
# Returns: {
#   "results": [
#     {
#       "chunk": "...",
#       "score": 0.95,
#       "documentId": "...",
#       "metadata": {...}
#     }
#   ]
# }

6. Link to Zep Documentation 💡

Consider adding a reference link to Zep AI's documentation for users who might need to reference their old API.

Summary

What's Good:

Well-structured and follows existing patterns
Clear migration path with practical examples
Proper JSON config update

What Needs Attention:

Verify and fix API method consistency (search.execute vs memories.search)
Add TypeScript examples for completeness
Enhance migration script with error handling

Verdict: This PR is ready to merge after addressing the API method inconsistency. The other suggestions are nice-to-haves that would improve the documentation quality but aren't blockers.

Great work on maintaining documentation consistency! 🎉

cloudflare-workers-and-pages · 2025-12-07T03:31:37Z

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status	Name	Latest Commit	Updated (UTC)
❌ Deployment failed View logs	supermemory-app	`b8e98c7`	Dec 20 2025, 12:50 AM

Dhravya · 2025-12-07T03:42:29Z

apps/docs/migration/from-zep.mdx

+
+```python Supermemory
+client.memories.add({
+    "content": "User prefers dark mode",
+    "container_tags": ["user_123"]
+})
+```


it's client.add() now

also, it's preferred to use containerTag instead of container_tags

Dhravya · 2025-12-07T03:43:08Z

This PR only includes the code migration - not the data migration stuff. We should look into the data migration as well.

MaheshtheDev · 2025-12-07T03:44:03Z

This PR only includes the code migration - not the data migration stuff. We should look into the data migration as well.

you mean migration script?

claude · 2025-12-07T03:44:30Z

PR Review: Migration Guide from Zep to Supermemory

Thank you for contributing this migration guide! This is a valuable addition for users coming from Zep AI. I've reviewed the PR and have the following feedback:

✅ Strengths

Well-structured comparison table at the top
Clear API mapping examples
Includes both Python and TypeScript code samples
Consistent formatting with the existing Mem0 migration guide

🐛 Issues Found

1. Incorrect Search API Method (Critical)

The guide uses client.search.execute() but according to the SDK documentation (apps/docs/memory-api/sdks/typescript.mdx:23 and apps/docs/memory-api/sdks/python.mdx:25), this is the correct method.

However, there's an inconsistency in the "Getting All Memories" section:

Line 113-115: Uses client.memories.list() which is correct ✅

But the search examples should clarify which endpoint is being used (/v3/search for documents vs /v4/search for memories). Based on the search docs (apps/docs/search/overview.mdx), the guide should specify:

Use client.search.execute() for document search (from Zep's session-based messages)
Consider mentioning client.memories.search() if searching extracted memories

2. Missing Context About Async Processing

Line 172: Mentions "Async processing" in Important Notes, but doesn't provide actionable guidance:

How long should users wait?
How to check if documents are ready?
Should recommend polling or using status checks

The Mem0 migration guide (from-mem0.mdx) doesn't have this issue because it's more detailed.

3. Incomplete Migration Script (Line 177-189)

# Export from Zep AI
zep_memories = client.memory.get(session_id="user_123")

# Import to Supermemory
for memory in zep_memories.memories:
    client.memories.add({
        "content": memory.content,
        "container_tags": [memory.session_id],
        "metadata": memory.metadata or {}
    })

Issues:

Assumes Zep's response structure without showing imports
No error handling (unlike from-mem0.mdx:154)
Doesn't handle the async processing mentioned in Important Notes
Missing the client initialization for Zep

4. TypeScript Examples Use Python Syntax

Lines 35-40, 127-167: All TypeScript code blocks use Python-style dictionary syntax:

client.memories.add({
    "content": "I love Python",  // ❌ TypeScript doesn't need quotes for keys
    "container_tags": container_tags,
    "metadata": {"role": "user"}  // ❌ Python-style
})

Should be:

client.memories.add({
    content: "I love Python",
    containerTags: containerTags,  // Note: camelCase in TypeScript
    metadata: { role: "user" }
})

5. Missing Installation Consistency

Lines 18-27: Installation section shows both languages, but doesn't match the pattern from TypeScript SDK docs (apps/docs/memory-api/sdks/typescript.mdx:9) which uses npm install supermemory (no bash label needed in the markdown).

6. API Parameter Inconsistency

The guide uses snake_case (container_tags) in TypeScript examples, but the TypeScript SDK uses camelCase (containerTags). This needs to be consistent with the actual SDK.

📋 Suggestions

Code Quality

Add error handling to migration script (see from-mem0.mdx:154 for reference)
Fix TypeScript syntax to use proper object notation and camelCase
Add status checking example for async processing
Complete the data migration script with proper imports and client setup

Documentation

Add a "Why Migrate" section similar to from-mem0.mdx:9-16
Clarify search endpoint differences (/v3/search vs /v4/search)
Add note about Memory Router alternative (similar to from-mem0.mdx:245)
Link to relevant docs at the bottom (quickstart, how-it-works, etc.) like from-mem0.mdx:298

Testing

Since this is documentation, please verify:

All code examples are syntactically correct
TypeScript examples use actual TypeScript/JavaScript syntax
Python examples are tested against current SDK version

🔒 Security & Best Practices

✅ API keys properly referenced via environment variables
✅ No hardcoded credentials

📊 Performance Considerations

Should mention that bulk migrations might hit rate limits
Consider recommending batch processing for large datasets

Overall Assessment

This is a solid foundation for a migration guide, but needs refinement to match:

The quality and completeness of the existing from-mem0.mdx guide
The actual SDK APIs (TypeScript camelCase vs Python snake_case)
Better handling of async processing concerns

Recommendation: Request changes to fix the TypeScript syntax, complete the migration script, and add more context about async processing.

Would you like help implementing these fixes? Happy to provide corrected code examples!

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

claude · 2025-12-07T03:45:52Z

Code Review: Migration Guide from Zep to Supermemory

Thank you for this contribution! The migration guide is well-structured and follows the existing patterns. Here's my detailed review:

✅ Strengths

Good Structure: The document follows the same pattern as the existing Mem0 migration guide with clear sections
Practical Examples: Code examples are comprehensive and show both Zep and Supermemory side-by-side
Proper Integration: Correctly added to docs.json navigation
Complete Migration Path: Includes data migration script at the end

🐛 Critical Issues

1. API Inconsistency - Search Method (High Priority)

The search examples use search.execute() which is correct and consistent with the rest of the codebase. However, I noticed the existing from-mem0.mdx guide uses memories.search() which appears to be outdated.

Current (Correct):

results = client.search.execute({
    "q": "programming",
    "container_tags": container_tags,
    "limit": 3
})

Recommendation: The from-mem0.mdx file should be updated in a separate PR to use search.execute() instead of memories.search() for consistency.

2. TypeScript Examples Missing

Unlike the Mem0 migration guide which shows both Python and TypeScript consistently, this guide only shows Python examples in the complete example section.

Suggested Addition (around line 167):

import { Supermemory } from "supermemory";

const client = new Supermemory({ apiKey: "..." });
const containerTags = ["user_123"];

await client.memories.add({
    content: "I love Python",
    containerTags: containerTags,
    metadata: { role: "user" }
});

const results = await client.search.execute({
    q: "programming",
    containerTags: containerTags,
    limit: 3
});

💡 Suggestions for Improvement

3. Add "Why Migrate" Section

The Mem0 guide has a compelling "Why Migrate to Supermemory?" section. Consider adding a similar section highlighting:

Comparison of Zep vs Supermemory features
Benefits of container tags over sessions
Supermemory's additional capabilities

4. Clarify Async Processing

The "Important Notes" section mentions async processing, but could be more explicit:

- **Async processing** - Documents process asynchronously (status: `queued` → `processing` → `done`). Wait a few seconds before searching newly added content.

5. Add Error Handling in Migration Script

The data migration script at the end could benefit from error handling:

# Import to Supermemory
for memory in zep_memories.memories:
    try:
        client.memories.add({
            "content": memory.content,
            "container_tags": [memory.session_id],
            "metadata": memory.metadata or {}
        })
        print(f"✅ Imported: {memory.content[:50]}...")
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"❌ Failed to import: {e}")

6. Minor: Consistency in Method Names

In the "Getting All Memories" section:

Document title says "memories" but shows documents = client.memories.list()
Consider clarifying: "In Supermemory, memories are stored as documents"

7. Link Verification

Ensure these relative links work in the docs site:

/memory-api/sdks/overview
/memory-api/overview
/search/overview

🔒 Security Considerations

✅ No security issues identified. API keys are properly shown as placeholders.

🧪 Testing Recommendations

Test the migration script with actual Zep API to ensure the data structure matches
Verify all code examples are syntactically correct
Test all internal documentation links

📝 Summary

This is a solid migration guide that will help Zep users transition to Supermemory. The main issues are:

Add TypeScript examples for consistency
Consider adding a "Why Migrate" section
Improve error handling in migration script

The API usage is correct and follows the established patterns in the codebase.

Recommendation: Approve with minor revisions.

Review generated following CLAUDE.md conventions and verified against existing migration documentation patterns.

claude · 2025-12-07T07:47:45Z

Code Review - PR #612: Migration Guide from Zep to Supermemory

Great work on creating this migration guide! This is a valuable addition to the documentation. Here's my detailed review:

✅ Strengths

Excellent Structure: The guide follows the same format as the existing Mem0 migration guide, providing consistency across the documentation
Comprehensive Coverage: The mapping table at the top gives users an immediate overview of key differences
Multiple Code Examples: Both Python and TypeScript examples throughout make it accessible to different audiences
Complete Migration Script: The full TypeScript migration script with error handling, backup creation, and progress tracking is particularly helpful

🐛 Critical Issues

1. API Inconsistency - `client.add()` vs `client.memories.add()`

Location: Multiple places throughout the document

The document uses inconsistent API methods:

Line 76-79: Uses client.add()
Line 93-97: Uses client.search.execute()
Line 111-115: Uses client.memories.list()

Issue: After comparing with the Mem0 migration guide (which uses client.memories.add(), client.memories.search(), client.memories.list()), this appears inconsistent.

Recommendation:

Verify the correct API structure from the actual Supermemory SDK
Use consistent method paths throughout (likely should be client.memories.add(), client.memories.search(), etc.)
Update all code examples to match

2. Python Syntax Error in Migration Script

Location: Line 238

**(mem.metadata or {})  # ❌ This is dictionary unpacking, needs to be inside a dict

Fix:

"metadata": {
    "role": mem.role,
    "type": "message",
    "original_uuid": mem.uuid,
    **(mem.metadata if mem.metadata else {})
}

⚠️ Moderate Issues

3. Incorrect Parameter Name

Location: Lines 76-79, 202-206, 228-236, 332-338

The document uses containerTag (singular) but the comparison table at the top shows containerTags (plural). Based on the Mem0 migration guide, it should be container_tags in Python and likely containerTags (plural) in TypeScript.

Recommendation: Make it consistent and verify the correct parameter name from the SDK.

4. Missing Import Statement

Location: Line 251 (TypeScript migration script)

The script uses dotenv and fs but the imports might not work in all environments:

import * as dotenv from "dotenv"; - Works but could be import dotenv from "dotenv";
import * as fs from "fs"; - Could use import { writeFileSync } from "fs"; for tree-shaking

Minor issue but worth noting for best practices.

5. Incomplete Error Handling in Quick Migration

Location: Lines 195-213 (TypeScript quick migration)

The quick migration example does not have try-catch blocks, which could cause the script to fail silently or crash unexpectedly.

Recommendation: Add basic error handling around the supermemory.add() calls.

💡 Suggestions for Improvement

6. Add Rate Limiting Guidance

The migration scripts do not mention rate limiting. For users migrating large datasets, this could cause API failures.

Recommendation: Add a note about:

Rate limits for the Supermemory API
Suggest adding delays between batches
Mention using the full migration script which presumably has better error handling

7. Search Method Inconsistency

Location: Line 93-97

Uses client.search.execute() but the Mem0 guide uses client.memories.search(). This needs clarification.

8. Async Processing Note Could Be Clearer

Location: Line 171 ("Important Notes" section)

The note says "Documents may take a moment to be searchable" but does not explain:

How long typically?
How to check if processing is complete?
What to do if waiting for search results immediately after import?

Recommendation: Add practical guidance about timing and status checking.

9. TypeScript Types Missing

The TypeScript examples do not show type annotations. While not strictly necessary, it would be helpful for TypeScript users to see the expected types, especially since the MigrationStats interface is shown (kudos!).

📋 Documentation Best Practices

✅ Good:

CodeGroup usage for side-by-side comparisons
Consistent formatting with existing docs
Backup creation in full migration script
Progress tracking

⚠️ Could Improve:

Add a prerequisites section (Node.js version, Python version, SDK versions)
Include a troubleshooting section for common migration issues
Add a verification step ("How to verify your migration was successful")

🔒 Security Considerations

API Key Exposure ✅ - Good use of environment variables in examples
Backup Files ⚠️ - The migration script creates backup files but does not warn users these contain sensitive data that should be stored securely

Recommendation: Add a warning about backup file security.

🧪 Test Coverage

N/A - This is documentation, but consider:

Testing the code examples to ensure they actually work
Having someone unfamiliar with the migration process try to follow the guide

📝 Action Items Summary

Must Fix Before Merge:

Resolve API method inconsistency (client.add() vs client.memories.add())
Fix Python dictionary unpacking syntax error (line 238)
Clarify containerTag vs containerTags vs container_tags naming

Should Fix:
4. Add error handling to quick migration example
5. Clarify the correct search method (client.search.execute() vs client.memories.search())
6. Add rate limiting guidance for large migrations

Nice to Have:
7. Add prerequisites section
8. Add troubleshooting section
9. Include migration verification steps
10. Add security note about backup files

🎯 Overall Assessment

Quality: High - Well-structured and comprehensive
Completeness: 85% - Missing some edge cases and clarifications
Accuracy: ⚠️ Needs verification - API method inconsistencies need to be resolved
Recommendation: Request Changes - Fix critical API inconsistencies before merging

Great effort on this guide! Once the API method naming is verified and made consistent, this will be an excellent resource for Zep users migrating to Supermemory. 🚀

Dhravya · 2025-12-08T05:29:21Z

@MaheshtheDev can you also fix the mintlify broken links issue here?

MaheshtheDev · 2025-12-08T06:54:40Z

@MaheshtheDev can you also fix the mintlify broken links issue here?

done, fixed them as well @Dhravya

claude · 2025-12-08T06:56:23Z

Pull Request Review: Migration Guide from Zep to Supermemory

Great work on adding this migration guide! This is a valuable resource for users migrating from Zep. Here's my detailed review:

✅ Strengths

Excellent Structure: The guide follows a logical flow with clear sections (Key Differences → API Mapping → Migration Steps → Complete Examples)
Comprehensive Coverage: Includes both quick migration scripts and full production-ready migration scripts with error handling
Side-by-Side Comparisons: The CodeGroup approach showing Zep vs Supermemory is very effective
Multi-Language Support: Provides examples in both Python and TypeScript
Consistent with Existing Docs: Follows the same patterns as the existing from-mem0.mdx migration guide
Documentation Link Cleanup: Good work updating broken internal links across multiple files

🐛 Issues Found

Critical: API Inconsistencies

Line 76-79, 114-118: Inconsistent API method naming

# In from-zep.mdx
client.add({...})  # Line 76
client.memories.list({...})  # Line 114

# But in from-mem0.mdx the pattern is:
client.memories.add(...)
client.memories.list(...)

Fix: Change client.add() to client.memories.add() for consistency (lines 76, 157, 204, 239, 331)

Line 96-100: Search API inconsistency

# from-zep.mdx uses:
results = client.search.execute({...})

# from-mem0.mdx uses:
results = client.memories.search(...)

Fix: Verify which is the correct API. If it's client.memories.search(), update lines 96, 163

Minor Issues

Line 12: Typo in table - containerTags should be singular to match usage

- | `session.create()` | Use `containerTags` parameter |
+ | `session.create()` | Use `containerTag` parameter |

Line 318: Unnecessary as any type assertion
```
for (const [sessionId, data] of Object.entries(exportedData) as any) {
```
Suggestion: Properly type exportedData or use a more specific type
Line 283: Using any type for exportedData
```
const exportedData: any = {};
```
Suggestion: Define a proper interface for better type safety

🔒 Security Considerations

API Key Handling (Lines 192, 227, 361-362): ✅ Good use of placeholders and environment variables
No Hardcoded Secrets: ✅ All examples use placeholder values
Backup Creation (Line 311-312): ✅ Excellent practice to save backups before migration

⚡ Performance Considerations

Sequential Processing (Lines 198-217, 323-349): The migration scripts process memories sequentially with await in loops

Suggestion: For large migrations, consider batch processing:

const BATCH_SIZE = 50;
for (let i = 0; i < memories.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
  const batch = memories.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE);
  await Promise.all(batch.map(mem => supermemory.add({...})));
}

Rate Limiting: No mention of API rate limits

Suggestion: Add a note about potential rate limits and how to handle them

📝 Code Quality

Error Handling: ✅ Good error handling in the full migration script (lines 289-307, 325-348)
Progress Tracking: ✅ Excellent progress tracking in the full script (line 344)
Comments: ✅ Clear inline comments explaining each section
TypeScript Typing: ⚠️ Could be improved (see issues New UI #4 and New UI #5 above)

🧪 Test Coverage

Recommendation: The migration scripts should be tested with:

Empty session scenarios
Sessions with no memories
Large datasets (1000+ memories)
Network failure scenarios

📋 Suggestions

Add Prerequisites Section: Consider adding a section at the top mentioning:
- Required versions of SDKs
- Node.js/Python version requirements
- Expected migration time for large datasets

Add Validation Step: After migration, suggest verifying data:

// Verify migration
const originalCount = zepMemories.length;
const migratedDocs = await supermemory.memories.list({
  containerTag: ["imported_from_zep"],
  limit: 1000
});
console.log(`Migrated ${migratedDocs.length}/${originalCount} memories`);

Rate Limiting Guidance: Add a section on handling rate limits:

const delay = (ms: number) => new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, ms));

// Add between requests if hitting rate limits
await delay(100); // 100ms delay

Rollback Strategy: Consider adding a "Troubleshooting" section explaining how to:
- Identify failed migrations
- Retry failed items
- Roll back if needed

🎯 Action Items

Must Fix (Breaking Issues):

Fix API method naming inconsistency: client.add() → client.memories.add()
Verify and standardize search API: client.search.execute() vs client.memories.search()

Should Fix (Quality Issues):

Fix table typo: containerTags → containerTag (line 12)
Improve TypeScript typing (remove any types)
Add rate limiting guidance
Add data validation step after migration

Nice to Have:

Add prerequisites section
Add performance optimization for large migrations (batch processing)
Add troubleshooting/rollback section

📊 Overall Assessment

Score: 8.5/10

This is a high-quality migration guide that will be very helpful for Zep users. The main issues are API consistency problems that need to be fixed before merging. Once the critical issues are addressed, this will be an excellent resource.

The documentation link cleanup across other files is also well done and helps maintain consistency throughout the docs.

Recommendation: Request changes to fix the API method naming inconsistencies, then approve.

graphite-app · 2025-12-20T00:46:21Z

Merge activity

Dec 20, 12:46 AM UTC: Dhravya added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
Dec 20, 12:49 AM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.

add docs for Migration Guide from zep to supermemory

MaheshtheDev marked this pull request as ready for review December 7, 2025 03:27

graphite-app bot assigned MaheshtheDev Dec 7, 2025

graphite-app bot requested a review from Dhravya December 7, 2025 03:27

mintlify bot deployed to staging - apps/docs December 7, 2025 03:27 View deployment

Dhravya reviewed Dec 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

mintlify bot deployed to staging - apps/docs December 7, 2025 07:46 View deployment

MaheshtheDev requested a review from Dhravya December 7, 2025 07:46

mintlify bot deployed to staging - apps/docs December 8, 2025 06:54 View deployment

Dhravya approved these changes Dec 20, 2025

View reviewed changes

add(docs): migration guide from zep to supermemory (#612)

b8e98c7

add docs for Migration Guide from zep to supermemory

graphite-app bot force-pushed the 12-06-add_docs_migration_guide_from_zep_to_supermemory branch from de55f4a to b8e98c7 Compare December 20, 2025 00:47

mintlify bot deployed to staging - apps/docs December 20, 2025 00:48 View deployment

graphite-app bot merged commit b8e98c7 into main Dec 20, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed

mintlify bot deployed to staging - apps/docs December 20, 2025 00:50 View deployment

add(docs): migration guide from zep to supermemory #612

add(docs): migration guide from zep to supermemory #612

Uh oh!

Conversation

MaheshtheDev commented Dec 7, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

MaheshtheDev commented Dec 7, 2025

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Dec 7, 2025

Code Review: Migration Guide from Zep to Supermemory

Overall Assessment

Code Quality ✅

Strengths

Style & Conventions

Potential Issues & Improvements

1. API Method Inconsistency ⚠️

2. TypeScript Examples Missing ⚠️

3. Error Handling in Migration Script 💡

4. Async Processing Note Placement 💡

Security Concerns ✅

Performance Considerations ✅

Test Coverage

Additional Suggestions

5. Response Structure Example 💡

6. Link to Zep Documentation 💡

Summary

Uh oh!

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Dec 7, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Deploying with Cloudflare Workers

Uh oh!

Dhravya Dec 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

MaheshtheDev Dec 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Dhravya commented Dec 7, 2025

Uh oh!

MaheshtheDev commented Dec 7, 2025

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Dec 7, 2025

PR Review: Migration Guide from Zep to Supermemory

✅ Strengths

🐛 Issues Found

1. Incorrect Search API Method (Critical)

2. Missing Context About Async Processing

3. Incomplete Migration Script (Line 177-189)

4. TypeScript Examples Use Python Syntax

5. Missing Installation Consistency

6. API Parameter Inconsistency

📋 Suggestions

Code Quality

Documentation

Testing

🔒 Security & Best Practices

📊 Performance Considerations

Overall Assessment

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Dec 7, 2025

Code Review: Migration Guide from Zep to Supermemory

✅ Strengths

🐛 Critical Issues

1. API Inconsistency - Search Method (High Priority)

2. TypeScript Examples Missing

💡 Suggestions for Improvement

3. Add "Why Migrate" Section

4. Clarify Async Processing

5. Add Error Handling in Migration Script

6. Minor: Consistency in Method Names

7. Link Verification

🔒 Security Considerations

🧪 Testing Recommendations

📝 Summary

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Dec 7, 2025

Code Review - PR #612: Migration Guide from Zep to Supermemory

✅ Strengths

MaheshtheDev commented Dec 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Dec 7, 2025 •

edited

Loading

1. API Inconsistency - `client.add()` vs `client.memories.add()`

graphite-app bot commented Dec 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading