-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
feat(raycast-extension): initial version of supermemory extension for raycast #440
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(raycast-extension): initial version of supermemory extension for raycast #440
Conversation
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
supermemory-app | 163c9da | Oct 02 2025, 04:32 PM |
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd the label Main to this PR to add it to the merge queue. You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Code Review FeedbackI have thoroughly reviewed the Raycast extension implementation. Overall, this is a well-structured and professionally implemented extension that follows Raycast best practices. Here is my detailed analysis: ✅ StrengthsCode Quality & Architecture
Security & Best Practices
User Experience
🔧 Recommendations for ImprovementCode Quality
Error Handling
Performance
🚨 Issues to AddressMissing Test Coverage
Documentation
📊 Technical Assessment
🎯 Priority Actions
💡 Enhancement Suggestions
This is a solid implementation that demonstrates good understanding of both Raycast development patterns and React best practices. The code is production-ready with the removal of debug logging, though adding tests would significantly improve maintainability. Approval Status: ✅ Approved with minor changes - Remove debug logging and consider adding tests for future iterations. |
Code Review: Raycast Extension ImplementationI've thoroughly reviewed the Raycast extension PR and have the following feedback: 🎉 Positive AspectsExcellent Architecture & Structure:
Strong Security Implementation:
Great User Experience:
🔧 Technical Feedback & SuggestionsCode Quality (Overall: Excellent)
Minor Improvements:
🔒 Security Review✅ Excellent Security Practices:
✅ No Security Concerns Identified 🚀 Performance ConsiderationsOptimizations Implemented:
Suggestions:
🧪 Testing & Quality AssuranceMissing (as expected for initial version):
Recommendation: Consider adding basic tests for the API layer, especially error handling scenarios. 🔄 Web App IntegrationExcellent Integration:
📝 DocumentationWell Documented:
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis is a high-quality implementation that follows best practices for both Raycast extensions and the existing codebase patterns. The code is well-structured, secure, and provides excellent user experience. Recommendation: ✅ Approve with confidence The implementation demonstrates strong engineering practices and integrates seamlessly with the existing Supermemory ecosystem. Perfect foundation for a production Raycast extension. 🔄 Next Steps (Optional Enhancements)
Great work on this implementation! 🚀 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
🔍 Code Review: Raycast Extension for SupermemoryOverviewThis PR adds a well-structured Raycast extension that integrates with the Supermemory API. The extension provides two core commands: adding memories and searching through existing memories. ✅ StrengthsCode Quality & Best Practices
Security Considerations
Performance Optimizations
|
Code Review: Raycast Extension for SupermemoryOverall, this is a well-implemented Raycast extension that provides clean integration with the Supermemory API. Here's my detailed feedback: ✅ StrengthsCode Quality & Architecture:
User Experience:
Security:
🔧 Areas for ImprovementError Handling & Resilience:
Performance & Resource Management:
Code Robustness:
Type Safety:
🔒 Security ConsiderationsLow Risk Items:
Recommendations:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
📦 Dependencies & ConfigurationPackage Management:
Build & Deploy:
💡 Enhancement Suggestions
🚀 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid implementation that follows best practices for Raycast extensions. The code is clean, well-structured, and provides good user experience. The main areas for improvement are around resilience, error handling, and test coverage. Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor improvements The extension is ready for release with the current implementation. The suggested improvements can be addressed in future iterations. |
🔍 Pull Request Review: Raycast Extension for SupermemoryThis is a well-structured Raycast extension implementation! Here's my comprehensive review: ✅ StrengthsCode Quality & Architecture:
Security & Best Practices:
User Experience:
🔧 Suggestions for Improvement1. Type Safety Enhancement (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:23) // Consider making chunks type more specific
chunks: Array<{ content?: string; text?: string } | string>;2. Error Boundary Implementation 3. Rate Limiting Consideration (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:49) 4. Package.json Optimization (apps/raycast-extension/package.json)
🛡️ Security Assessment✅ Secure:
📊 Performance Considerations
🧪 Testing RecommendationsConsider adding:
📁 Monorepo IntegrationGood integration with the existing monorepo:
🏆 Overall AssessmentThis is a high-quality implementation that follows Raycast best practices and integrates well with the Supermemory ecosystem. The code is production-ready with good error handling, security practices, and user experience. Recommendation: ✅ Approve - Ready to merge after addressing minor type safety improvements if desired. The extension provides valuable functionality for Supermemory users and maintains the quality standards of the project. |
Comprehensive Code Review: Raycast ExtensionGreat work on implementing the Supermemory Raycast extension! This is a solid foundation with good TypeScript usage and proper Raycast patterns. Here's my detailed review: 🎯 Overall Assessment: Good (B+)Strengths:
🚨 Critical Issues to Fix1. Silent Error Handling in Add Memory (
|
Pull Request Review: Raycast ExtensionI've reviewed PR #440 which adds a Raycast extension for Supermemory. Here's my detailed feedback: 🎉 Strengths
🐛 Potential Issues & Bugs1. Security Concern - API Key Exposure (HIGH)The API key is exported as a constant at module load time. If preferences aren't set yet, this could cause runtime errors. Consider making this a function instead of a constant export. 2. Missing Error Handling (MEDIUM)The search function doesn't handle network failures gracefully. Should add explicit error boundaries or toast notifications for errors. 3. Race Condition Risk (MEDIUM)The debounced search doesn't cancel in-flight requests. With rapid typing, multiple API calls could resolve out of order. 4. Hardcoded URLs (LOW)BASE_URL is hardcoded. Consider making this configurable for development/testing environments. ⚡ Performance Considerations
🔒 Security Concerns
🧪 Test CoverageCritical Gap: No tests are included for:
Recommend adding at least unit tests for API functions. 📝 Code Quality Suggestions
🎯 RecommendationsMust Fix:
Should Fix:
Nice to Have:
📚 DocumentationThe README is good but could be enhanced:
✅ Overall AssessmentThis is a solid first implementation with good structure and features. The main concerns are:
Recommendation: Request changes for the must-fix items before merging. Great work overall! This will be a valuable addition to the Supermemory ecosystem. 🚀 |
|
Conflicts |
Merge activity
|
cf4c827 to
34c8280
Compare
PR Review: Raycast Extension for SupermemoryOverviewThis PR adds a well-structured Raycast extension that enables users to add and search memories from their Supermemory knowledge base. The implementation is clean and follows good practices overall. ✅ Strengths
🔧 Suggestions for Improvement1. Error Recovery & User Feedback (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts)
} catch (error) {
console.error("Failed to retrieve API key:", error);
throw new AuthenticationError("Failed to get API key from preferences.");
}2. Type Safety (apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx)
interface ContentChunk {
content?: string;
text?: string;
}3. Hardcoded API URL (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:50)
4. Missing Input Validation (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts)
5. Missing Tests
6. Package.json Inconsistency
7. Rate Limiting Consideration
8. Accessibility (apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx)
🔒 Security Review✅ No critical security issues found
📊 Performance
🧪 Testing Recommendations
📝 Documentation✅ Good:
🔧 Could improve:
🎯 VerdictRecommendation: Approve with minor suggestions This is a solid, well-implemented Raycast extension that follows best practices. The code is clean, type-safe, and user-friendly. The suggestions above are non-blocking improvements that could be addressed in follow-up PRs or before merge depending on the team's preferences. Great work on this feature! 🚀 Review generated with Claude Code |
Code Review: Raycast ExtensionThank you for this comprehensive PR adding a Raycast extension! This is a great addition to the Supermemory ecosystem. Here's my detailed review: ✅ Strengths
🐛 Potential IssuesHigh Priority
Medium Priority
⚡ Performance Considerations
🔒 Security Concerns
🧪 Test Coverage
📝 Code Quality
📋 Documentation & Maintenance
🎯 RecommendationsMust Fix Before Merge:
Should Fix Before Merge:
Nice to Have:
🎉 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid first version of the Raycast extension! The code is generally well-written with good TypeScript usage and proper separation of concerns. The main concerns are around error handling, race conditions, and lack of tests. Recommendation: Fix the must-fix issues above before merging. The should-fix and nice-to-have items can be addressed in follow-up PRs. Great work! 🚀 |
… raycast (#440) feat(raycast-extension): initial version of supermemory extension for raycast chore: update the metadata and ui for app to get api key  
e0eaef2 to
163c9da
Compare
Pull Request Review: Raycast ExtensionThank you for implementing the Raycast extension for Supermemory! This is a well-structured addition that provides valuable functionality for Mac and Windows users. Here's my comprehensive review: ✅ StrengthsCode Quality
Best Practices
🔍 Issues & Recommendations1. Security ConcernsAPI Key Exposure in URLLocation: const [selectedShortcutType, setSelectedShortcutType] = useState<"add" | "search" | null>(null)The iOS shortcut URLs pass API keys through URL parameters. While this is somewhat necessary for shortcuts, ensure:
Recommendation: Add documentation in the README about API key security best practices. 2. Error Handling IssuesSilent Error CatchLocation: } catch {
throw new AuthenticationError("Failed to get API key from preferences.");
}Issue: The error is caught but not logged, making debugging difficult. Fix: } catch (error) {
console.error("Failed to get API key from preferences:", error);
throw new AuthenticationError("Failed to get API key from preferences.");
}Similar Issue at Line 118Location: } catch {
// Ignore JSON parsing errors, use default message
}Recommendation: At least log the error for debugging: } catch (error) {
console.error("Failed to parse error response:", error);
// Use default message
}3. Type Safety IssuesUnknown Type in ChunksLocation: chunks: unknown[];Issue: Using Recommendation: Define a proper type: interface Chunk {
content?: string;
text?: string;
}
export interface SearchResult {
documentId: string;
chunks: (string | Chunk)[];
// ...
}4. Potential Memory LeaksUncleared TimeoutLocation: const debounceTimer = setTimeout(() => {
performSearch(searchText);
}, 500);
return () => clearTimeout(debounceTimer);Issue: While the cleanup is present, if Fix: Add memoization dependencies check or consider using a custom debounce hook: const debouncedSearch = useMemo(
() => debounce((query: string) => performSearch(query), 500),
[performSearch]
);5. Missing Error BoundariesThe extension doesn't have error boundaries to catch React errors gracefully. If any component crashes, it could break the entire extension. Recommendation: Add an error boundary component: class ErrorBoundary extends React.Component {
componentDidCatch(error, errorInfo) {
showToast({
style: Toast.Style.Failure,
title: "Something went wrong",
message: error.message
});
}
render() {
return this.props.children;
}
}6. Performance ConsiderationsContent Extraction InefficiencyLocation: The const contentMap = useMemo(() => {
return new Map(searchResults.map(memory => [
memory.documentId,
extractContent(memory)
]));
}, [searchResults]);7. Testing ConcernsMissing:
Recommendation: Add at least basic tests: // api.test.ts
describe('addMemory', () => {
it('should successfully add memory with valid data', async () => {
// test implementation
});
it('should throw AuthenticationError with invalid API key', async () => {
// test implementation
});
});8. Code Quality IssuesMagic NumbersLocation: limit: 50, // Line 74
}, 500); // Line 105
const truncateContent = (content: string, maxLength = 100) // Line 124Recommendation: Extract to constants: const SEARCH_LIMIT = 50;
const DEBOUNCE_DELAY_MS = 500;
const MAX_PREVIEW_LENGTH = 100;Inconsistent Copy Button HandlingLocation: The same Fix: Pass the state setter as a parameter: const handleCopyApiKey = async (apiKey: string, setCopiedState: (value: boolean) => void) => {
try {
await navigator.clipboard.writeText(apiKey);
setCopiedState(true);
toast.success("API key copied to clipboard!");
setTimeout(() => setCopiedState(false), 2000);
} catch {
toast.error("Failed to copy API key");
}
};9. Documentation IssuesREADME InconsistencyLocation: You can get your API key from [supermemory.link/raycast](https://supermemory.link/raycast).This URL is mentioned but it's unclear if this redirect is set up. Ensure the link is configured or update to direct link. 10. Package.json IssuesDependencies Not UsedLocation: "@raycast/utils": "^1.17.0"Issue: The Recommendation: Either use it (it has helpful hooks like 🎯 Additional RecommendationsMonorepo Integration
API Endpoint VersioningThe extension uses
Rate LimitingNo visible rate limiting or throttling on the API calls. Consider:
Accessibility
📊 Summary
Overall: This is a solid implementation that follows React and TypeScript best practices. The main areas for improvement are:
✅ Approval StatusThe code is functional and well-written. The issues identified are mostly minor improvements rather than blocking concerns. I recommend:
Great work on this extension! 🚀 Files reviewed:
|


feat(raycast-extension): initial version of supermemory extension for raycast
chore: update the metadata and ui for app to get api key