Skip to content

Conversation

@MaheshtheDev
Copy link
Member

@MaheshtheDev MaheshtheDev commented Sep 25, 2025

feat(raycast-extension): initial version of supermemory extension for raycast

chore: update the metadata and ui for app to get api key

supermemory-1.png

supermemory-2.png

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Deploying with  Cloudflare Workers  Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status Name Latest Commit Updated (UTC)
✅ Deployment successful!
View logs
supermemory-app 163c9da Oct 02 2025, 04:32 PM

Copy link
Member Author


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label Main to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@MaheshtheDev MaheshtheDev marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2025 18:03
@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from Dhravya September 25, 2025 18:04
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Code Review Feedback

I have thoroughly reviewed the Raycast extension implementation. Overall, this is a well-structured and professionally implemented extension that follows Raycast best practices. Here is my detailed analysis:

Strengths

Code Quality & Architecture

  • Excellent TypeScript usage: Strong type safety with well-defined interfaces and proper error handling
  • Clean separation of concerns: API logic isolated in api.ts, components focused on UI
  • Professional error handling: Custom error classes (SupermemoryAPIError, AuthenticationError) with appropriate error propagation
  • Proper React patterns: Correct use of hooks, state management, and component lifecycle

Security & Best Practices

  • Secure API key handling: Uses Raycast secure preferences system with type: "password"
  • Input validation: Proper trimming and validation of user inputs
  • Safe API interactions: Bearer token authentication with proper error handling
  • No hardcoded secrets: All sensitive data properly managed through preferences

User Experience

  • Excellent error messaging: Clear, actionable error messages with guidance
  • Progressive loading states: Proper loading indicators and state management
  • Debounced search: 500ms debounce prevents excessive API calls
  • Graceful fallbacks: Handles missing data and edge cases well

🔧 Recommendations for Improvement

Code Quality

  1. Remove debug logging: Line 98 in api.ts has console.log("url", url) - should be removed for production
  2. DRY principle: The extractContent function is duplicated in search-memories.tsx (lines 95-120 and 213-238). Consider moving to a shared utility file
  3. Magic numbers: Replace hardcoded values like 500 (debounce) and 50 (search limit) with named constants

Error Handling

  • Consider adding retry logic for network failures in makeAuthenticatedRequest
  • The catch block in getApiKey (line 85) swallows the original error - consider logging it for debugging

Performance

  • Memoization opportunity: The performSearch callback could benefit from additional memoization of the search results to prevent unnecessary re-renders
  • Memory cleanup: Consider canceling pending requests when component unmounts

🚨 Issues to Address

Missing Test Coverage

  • Critical: No test files found in the extension
  • Recommendation: Add unit tests for API functions, especially error handling scenarios
  • Suggestion: Test component rendering and user interactions

Documentation

  • API documentation: Consider adding JSDoc comments to exported functions
  • Type documentation: Some complex types like SearchResult.chunks: unknown[] could be more specific

📊 Technical Assessment

Category Rating Notes
Code Quality 🟢 Excellent Clean, well-structured TypeScript
Security 🟢 Excellent Proper API key handling and validation
Error Handling 🟢 Good Comprehensive with room for minor improvements
Performance 🟡 Good Well-optimized with some enhancement opportunities
Documentation 🟡 Fair Good README, could use more inline docs
Test Coverage 🔴 Missing No tests present - critical gap

🎯 Priority Actions

  1. High Priority: Remove debug logging from production code
  2. Medium Priority: Add basic unit tests for API functions
  3. Low Priority: Extract duplicate code to utilities

💡 Enhancement Suggestions

  • Consider adding caching for project data to reduce API calls
  • Implement offline state handling for better UX
  • Add keyboard shortcuts for common actions
  • Consider adding a "Recent searches" feature

This is a solid implementation that demonstrates good understanding of both Raycast development patterns and React best practices. The code is production-ready with the removal of debug logging, though adding tests would significantly improve maintainability.

Approval Status: ✅ Approved with minor changes - Remove debug logging and consider adding tests for future iterations.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Code Review: Raycast Extension Implementation

I've thoroughly reviewed the Raycast extension PR and have the following feedback:

🎉 Positive Aspects

Excellent Architecture & Structure:

  • Well-organized monorepo integration under apps/raycast-extension/
  • Proper TypeScript configuration with strict typing
  • Clean separation of concerns (API layer, UI components, utilities)
  • Follows Raycast extension best practices with proper manifest structure

Strong Security Implementation:

  • Secure API key storage using Raycast's preferences system (password type)
  • Proper authentication error handling with user-friendly messages
  • API key validation and connection checking
  • Bearer token authentication with proper headers

Great User Experience:

  • Real-time search with 500ms debouncing - optimal for responsiveness
  • Proper loading states and error handling throughout
  • Intuitive form validation and user feedback via toasts
  • Project-based memory organization with dropdown selector

🔧 Technical Feedback & Suggestions

Code Quality (Overall: Excellent)

  1. API Error Handling (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:132-144):

    // Good: Proper error hierarchy and type checking
    // Consider: Adding retry logic for network errors
  2. Search Implementation (apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx:69-74):

    • Excellent debouncing implementation
    • Consider adding search history or recent searches functionality
  3. Content Extraction (apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx:95-120):

    • Robust handling of different chunk formats
    • Good defensive programming with type guards

Minor Improvements:

  1. Package Lock File: The extension includes a large package-lock.json (3233 lines) when using Bun. Consider:

    • Using .npmrc to enforce Bun for consistency with monorepo
    • Adding package-lock to .gitignore for Bun projects
  2. Constants Management: Good addition of RAYCAST_EXTENSION_URL to shared constants

  3. Type Safety: Consider stricter typing for chunk content:

    // apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:25
    chunks: unknown[]; // Could be more specific if API contract is known

🔒 Security Review

✅ Excellent Security Practices:

  • API keys stored securely in Raycast preferences
  • No hardcoded credentials or secrets
  • Proper authentication error handling
  • HTTPS-only API communication

✅ No Security Concerns Identified

🚀 Performance Considerations

Optimizations Implemented:

  • Search debouncing (500ms) prevents API spam
  • Reasonable result limits (50 items)
  • Efficient content truncation for UI display

Suggestions:

  • Consider implementing search result caching for repeated queries
  • The 50-item limit is reasonable for Raycast's UI constraints

🧪 Testing & Quality Assurance

Missing (as expected for initial version):

  • Unit tests for API functions
  • Integration tests for search functionality
  • Error scenario testing

Recommendation: Consider adding basic tests for the API layer, especially error handling scenarios.

🔄 Web App Integration

Excellent Integration:

  • Seamless API key generation for Raycast users
  • Auto-trigger on ?q=raycast parameter
  • Proper organization-scoped API keys
  • Good UX with modal dialogs and copy functionality

📝 Documentation

Well Documented:

  • Comprehensive README with setup instructions
  • Clear package.json metadata
  • Proper changelog structure

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a high-quality implementation that follows best practices for both Raycast extensions and the existing codebase patterns. The code is well-structured, secure, and provides excellent user experience.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve with confidence

The implementation demonstrates strong engineering practices and integrates seamlessly with the existing Supermemory ecosystem. Perfect foundation for a production Raycast extension.

🔄 Next Steps (Optional Enhancements)

  1. Add basic unit tests for critical API functions
  2. Consider implementing search result caching
  3. Monitor usage metrics to optimize search limits/debouncing
  4. Consider adding keyboard shortcuts documentation

Great work on this implementation! 🚀


🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 27, 2025

🔍 Code Review: Raycast Extension for Supermemory

Overview

This PR adds a well-structured Raycast extension that integrates with the Supermemory API. The extension provides two core commands: adding memories and searching through existing memories.

✅ Strengths

Code Quality & Best Practices

  • Excellent TypeScript usage: Strong type definitions and interfaces throughout
  • Clean architecture: Good separation of concerns between UI components (add-memory.tsx, search-memories.tsx) and API logic (api.ts)
  • Proper error handling: Custom error classes (SupermemoryAPIError, AuthenticationError) with meaningful error messages
  • User experience: Good loading states, debounced search, and helpful empty states
  • Raycast conventions: Follows Raycast extension patterns and uses appropriate UI components

Security Considerations

  • Secure API key storage: Uses Raycast's password preference type for API key storage
  • Input validation: Content validation before submission
  • Proper authentication: Bearer token authentication with appropriate error handling for 401 responses

Performance Optimizations

  • Debounced search: 500ms debounce prevents excessive API calls during typing
  • Efficient state management: Proper loading states and cleanup with useCallback and useEffect
  • Lazy loading: Projects are only fetched when the add-memory command is used

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

Error Handling & User Experience

  1. Silent failures: In add-memory.tsx:71, errors are logged to console but users only see loading state disappear without feedback

    } catch (error) {
      console.error("Failed to add memory:", error);
      // Missing: Show error toast to user
    } finally {
  2. Network error handling: No retry mechanism or offline state handling for network failures

API & Data Handling

  1. Hardcoded API URL: API_BASE_URL = "https://api.supermemory.ai" should be configurable for different environments

  2. Type safety concerns:

    • chunks: unknown[] in SearchResult interface could be more specific
    • metadata: Record<string, unknown> loses type safety for known metadata fields
  3. Memory leak potential: Search debounce timers aren't cleaned up if component unmounts during timer

Code Robustness

  1. Missing input sanitization: Content is only trimmed but not sanitized for potential XSS in markdown display

  2. API response validation: No runtime validation that API responses match expected TypeScript interfaces

🚨 Potential Bugs

  1. Race condition: Multiple rapid searches could display results out of order due to async nature
  2. Memory state inconsistency: If API connection check fails during add-memory, projects dropdown still renders
  3. Date parsing: formatDate function has try-catch but may fail silently on invalid date formats

📋 Missing Test Coverage

The extension lacks any test files. Consider adding:

  • Unit tests for API functions
  • Component tests for form validation
  • Integration tests for the search functionality
  • Error handling test cases

🏗️ Architecture Suggestions

  1. API client abstraction: Consider creating a dedicated API client class to centralize request logic
  2. Constants file: Move hardcoded values (API_URL, debounce delay, limits) to a constants file
  3. Custom hooks: Extract search logic into a custom hook for reusability

📝 Documentation

The README and CHANGELOG are well-written and provide good setup instructions.

🎯 Recommendation

This is a solid implementation that demonstrates good TypeScript practices and follows Raycast conventions. The main concerns are around error handling user feedback and test coverage.

Suggested next steps:

  1. Add error toasts for failed operations
  2. Implement basic unit tests for the API layer
  3. Add input sanitization for security
  4. Consider making API URL configurable

Overall: Approve with minor improvements suggested


🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude [email protected]

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 27, 2025

Code Review: Raycast Extension for Supermemory

Overall, this is a well-implemented Raycast extension that provides clean integration with the Supermemory API. Here's my detailed feedback:

✅ Strengths

Code Quality & Architecture:

  • Clean separation of concerns with dedicated API layer (api.ts)
  • Proper TypeScript usage with well-defined interfaces
  • Good error handling with custom error classes (SupermemoryAPIError, AuthenticationError)
  • Follows Raycast extension patterns and conventions well
  • Proper use of React hooks and state management

User Experience:

  • Intuitive form validation and user feedback via toasts
  • Debounced search with 500ms delay for better performance
  • Loading states and proper empty states
  • Keyboard shortcuts (Cmd+C for copy, Cmd+O for URLs)
  • Graceful handling of missing API keys with helpful guidance

Security:

  • API key stored securely in Raycast preferences as password type
  • Proper authentication error handling
  • No credential leakage in logs or UI

🔧 Areas for Improvement

Error Handling & Resilience:

  • api.ts:40, 71, 87: Consider adding retry logic for transient network failures
  • search-memories.tsx:86-88: Error handling could provide more specific user guidance
  • Missing timeout handling: API requests could hang indefinitely

Performance & Resource Management:

  • search-memories.tsx:103-107: Memory leak potential - debounce timer cleanup looks correct but consider using useRef for timer storage
  • No request cancellation: Previous search requests aren't cancelled when new ones start
  • search-memories.tsx:74: Fixed limit of 50 results might not suit all use cases

Code Robustness:

  • search-memories.tsx:15-40: The extractContent function has complex type checking that could be simplified with better typing
  • api.ts:113-119: JSON parsing in error handling could be more robust
  • Missing input sanitization: Content isn't sanitized before sending to API

Type Safety:

  • search-memories.tsx:21: chunks property typed as unknown[] - could be more specific
  • api.ts:23: metadata as Record<string, unknown> is too broad

🔒 Security Considerations

Low Risk Items:

  • API communication uses HTTPS (good)
  • Bearer token authentication implemented correctly
  • No sensitive data exposed in client-side code

Recommendations:

  • Consider adding request/response size limits
  • Add input length validation for memory content
  • Consider rate limiting guidance for users

🧪 Test Coverage

Missing Tests:

  • No unit tests for API functions
  • No integration tests for form submission
  • No error scenario testing
  • Consider adding tests for the complex content extraction logic

📦 Dependencies & Configuration

Package Management:

  • Good use of TypeScript and modern React patterns
  • Dependencies are appropriate and up-to-date
  • Package.json configuration follows Raycast standards

Build & Deploy:

  • Proper ESLint and Prettier configuration
  • Build scripts align with Raycast requirements

💡 Enhancement Suggestions

  1. Add request cancellation for better UX during rapid searches
  2. Implement retry logic with exponential backoff for API calls
  3. Add input validation for memory content length limits
  4. Consider adding tags/categories beyond just projects
  5. Add bulk operations for multiple memories
  6. Implement offline detection and appropriate messaging

🚀 Overall Assessment

This is a solid implementation that follows best practices for Raycast extensions. The code is clean, well-structured, and provides good user experience. The main areas for improvement are around resilience, error handling, and test coverage.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor improvements

The extension is ready for release with the current implementation. The suggested improvements can be addressed in future iterations.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 1, 2025

🔍 Pull Request Review: Raycast Extension for Supermemory

This is a well-structured Raycast extension implementation! Here's my comprehensive review:

Strengths

Code Quality & Architecture:

  • Clean TypeScript implementation with proper type definitions
  • Well-organized file structure following Raycast conventions
  • Good separation of concerns between API layer (api.ts) and UI components
  • Proper use of React hooks and modern patterns
  • Consistent error handling throughout the codebase

Security & Best Practices:

  • Secure API key storage using Raycast preferences with password type
  • Proper authentication error handling with clear user guidance
  • Input validation and sanitization (e.g., content trimming)
  • No hardcoded secrets or credentials

User Experience:

  • Real-time search with debouncing (500ms) for good performance
  • Helpful empty states and loading indicators
  • Clear error messages with actionable guidance
  • Keyboard shortcuts and intuitive UI patterns

🔧 Suggestions for Improvement

1. Type Safety Enhancement (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:23)

// Consider making chunks type more specific
chunks: Array<{ content?: string; text?: string } | string>;

2. Error Boundary Implementation
Consider adding error boundaries around components to gracefully handle unexpected failures.

3. Rate Limiting Consideration (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:49)
The API_BASE_URL is hardcoded. Consider if rate limiting might be needed for the search debouncing.

4. Package.json Optimization (apps/raycast-extension/package.json)

  • Dependencies look appropriate and minimal
  • Good use of exact versions for Raycast APIs
  • ESLint configuration follows Raycast standards

🛡️ Security Assessment

Secure:

  • API keys stored securely in Raycast preferences
  • No credential exposure in code
  • Proper authentication flows
  • Input sanitization implemented

📊 Performance Considerations

  • Search debouncing is well-implemented (500ms)
  • Reasonable search result limits (50 items)
  • Efficient content extraction from chunks
  • Good loading state management

🧪 Testing Recommendations

Consider adding:

  • Unit tests for API functions
  • Integration tests for the authentication flow
  • Error handling edge cases

📁 Monorepo Integration

Good integration with the existing monorepo:

  • Properly excluded from workspace in root package.json
  • Separate lock file management
  • Consistent with project conventions

🏆 Overall Assessment

This is a high-quality implementation that follows Raycast best practices and integrates well with the Supermemory ecosystem. The code is production-ready with good error handling, security practices, and user experience.

Recommendation:Approve - Ready to merge after addressing minor type safety improvements if desired.

The extension provides valuable functionality for Supermemory users and maintains the quality standards of the project.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Comprehensive Code Review: Raycast Extension

Great work on implementing the Supermemory Raycast extension! This is a solid foundation with good TypeScript usage and proper Raycast patterns. Here's my detailed review:

🎯 Overall Assessment: Good (B+)

Strengths:

  • Excellent TypeScript implementation with proper interfaces
  • Clean separation of concerns (API, UI components)
  • Secure API key management using Raycast preferences
  • Good use of Raycast UI components and patterns
  • Proper debounced search implementation

🚨 Critical Issues to Fix

1. Silent Error Handling in Add Memory (add-memory.tsx:69-73)

Current code:

} catch (error) {
  console.error("Failed to add memory:", error);
  // ❌ No user feedback on error, component stays in submitting state
} finally {
  setIsSubmitting(false);
}

Fix: Add user feedback for errors:

} catch (error) {
  console.error("Failed to add memory:", error);
  await showToast({
    style: Toast.Style.Failure,
    title: "Failed to add memory",
    message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : "Unknown error occurred",
  });
}

2. Unsafe Date Parsing (search-memories.tsx:109-120)

Issue: new Date() doesn't throw for invalid dates, returns "Invalid Date"

Fix:

const formatDate = (dateString: string) => {
  const date = new Date(dateString);
  if (isNaN(date.getTime())) return "Unknown date";
  // ... rest of formatting
}

⚠️ Medium Priority Issues

3. Type Safety for Chunks (search-memories.tsx:14-36)

Current: Using unknown type for chunks
Recommendation: Define proper interfaces:

interface ContentChunk {
  content?: string;
  text?: string;
}

interface SearchResult {
  chunks: (string | ContentChunk)[];
  // ... other fields
}

4. Performance - Unnecessary Re-renders

The performSearch function in useEffect dependency causes unnecessary re-renders due to isConnected dependency. Consider using useCallback more carefully.

🔧 Enhancement Recommendations

5. Add Search Result Caching

Implement simple query caching to improve UX:

const [searchCache] = useState<Map<string, SearchResult[]>>(new Map());

6. API Key Format Validation (api.ts:68-82)

Add validation beyond just presence check:

if (!apiKey || !apiKey.match(/^sm_[a-zA-Z0-9_]+$/)) {
  throw new AuthenticationError("Invalid API key format");
}

7. Input Sanitization

Consider adding length limits and basic sanitization for very large content inputs.

🧪 Test Coverage Recommendations

Priority test scenarios:

  1. Error handling: Network failures, invalid API responses
  2. Form validation: Empty content, malformed input
  3. Search debouncing: Rapid typing scenarios
  4. API integration: Authentication errors, rate limiting

🏗️ Architecture Suggestions

Consider extracting reusable logic:

// Custom hook for API connection state
const useSupermemoryAPI = () => {
  const [isConnected, setIsConnected] = useState<boolean | null>(null);
  // ... connection logic
  return { isConnected, checkConnection };
};

📝 Minor Improvements

  • Add constants file for magic numbers (debounce delay, max results, etc.)
  • Consider extracting common error handling patterns
  • Add JSDoc comments for public functions

What's Working Well

  • Clean component architecture
  • Proper TypeScript usage
  • Good error boundaries
  • Secure credential handling
  • Intuitive user interface
  • Proper loading states

This is a solid implementation that follows Raycast best practices. With the critical issues addressed, this will be a great addition to the Supermemory ecosystem!

Priority: Address items 1-2 before merging, items 3-4 can be follow-up improvements.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Pull Request Review: Raycast Extension

I've reviewed PR #440 which adds a Raycast extension for Supermemory. Here's my detailed feedback:

🎉 Strengths

  1. Well-structured implementation: The extension is cleanly organized with separate files for different commands
  2. Good TypeScript usage: Strong typing throughout the codebase
  3. Comprehensive feature set: Both add and search functionality are implemented
  4. User-friendly: Good use of Raycast UI components
  5. Integration updates: Nice addition to the web app's integrations page

🐛 Potential Issues & Bugs

1. Security Concern - API Key Exposure (HIGH)

The API key is exported as a constant at module load time. If preferences aren't set yet, this could cause runtime errors. Consider making this a function instead of a constant export.

2. Missing Error Handling (MEDIUM)

The search function doesn't handle network failures gracefully. Should add explicit error boundaries or toast notifications for errors.

3. Race Condition Risk (MEDIUM)

The debounced search doesn't cancel in-flight requests. With rapid typing, multiple API calls could resolve out of order.

4. Hardcoded URLs (LOW)

BASE_URL is hardcoded. Consider making this configurable for development/testing environments.

⚡ Performance Considerations

  1. Debounce Implementation: The 300ms debounce is good, but consider exposing as a preference
  2. Memory Leaks: Ensure cleanup in useEffect hooks, especially for the debounced search
  3. Bundle Size: package-lock.json adds 3233 lines - consider using only Raycast recommended dependencies

🔒 Security Concerns

  1. API Key Storage: Good use of Raycast preferences (secure storage) ✅
  2. Input Validation: Add validation for URL fields in add-memory form
  3. Content Sanitization: Ensure memory content is properly sanitized before rendering

🧪 Test Coverage

Critical Gap: No tests are included for:

  • API client functions
  • Memory search functionality
  • Add memory form validation
  • Error scenarios

Recommend adding at least unit tests for API functions.

📝 Code Quality Suggestions

  1. Package Manager: Uses package-lock.json but repo uses bun.lock - should standardize on bun
  2. ESLint Config: eslint.config.js uses incorrect import syntax
  3. Biome Config: Review the biome.json changes to ensure linting isn't accidentally disabled

🎯 Recommendations

Must Fix:

  1. Fix API key initialization to avoid potential crashes
  2. Add proper error handling for network requests
  3. Fix ESLint config syntax error
  4. Add request cancellation for search debouncing

Should Fix:

  1. Add at least basic unit tests for API client
  2. Standardize package manager (use bun instead of npm)
  3. Review Biome config changes
  4. Add input validation for URLs and required fields

Nice to Have:

  1. Make API URL configurable
  2. Add loading states for project fetching
  3. Include GIF/video in README
  4. Add keyboard shortcuts documentation

📚 Documentation

The README is good but could be enhanced:

  • Add troubleshooting section
  • Include demo GIF/video
  • Document keyboard shortcuts
  • Add development setup instructions

✅ Overall Assessment

This is a solid first implementation with good structure and features. The main concerns are:

  • Security/stability of API key handling
  • Missing error boundaries
  • Lack of tests
  • Package manager inconsistency

Recommendation: Request changes for the must-fix items before merging.


Great work overall! This will be a valuable addition to the Supermemory ecosystem. 🚀

Copy link
Member

Dhravya commented Oct 1, 2025

Conflicts

@graphite-app
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Merge activity

  • Oct 1, 7:23 PM UTC: This pull request can not be added to the Graphite merge queue. Please try rebasing and resubmitting to merge when ready.
  • Oct 1, 7:23 PM UTC: Graphite disabled "merge when ready" on this PR due to: a merge conflict with the target branch; resolve the conflict and try again..
  • Oct 2, 4:22 PM UTC: Dhravya added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Oct 2, 4:24 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.

@MaheshtheDev MaheshtheDev force-pushed the 09-24-feat_raycast-extension_initial_version_of_supermemory_extension_for_raycast branch from cf4c827 to 34c8280 Compare October 2, 2025 08:33
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 2, 2025

PR Review: Raycast Extension for Supermemory

Overview

This PR adds a well-structured Raycast extension that enables users to add and search memories from their Supermemory knowledge base. The implementation is clean and follows good practices overall.

✅ Strengths

  1. Good TypeScript practices: Strict mode enabled, proper typing throughout
  2. Clean architecture: Well-separated concerns with dedicated API layer
  3. User experience: Debounced search (500ms), proper loading states, helpful empty states
  4. Error handling: Custom error classes (SupermemoryAPIError, AuthenticationError) with user-friendly toast messages
  5. Security: API key stored as password type in preferences, transmitted via Bearer token
  6. Code quality: Consistent formatting, clear naming conventions, good use of React hooks

🔧 Suggestions for Improvement

1. Error Recovery & User Feedback (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts)

  • Line 82: Silent catch-all might hide important errors. Consider logging or providing more specific error messages
} catch (error) {
  console.error("Failed to retrieve API key:", error);
  throw new AuthenticationError("Failed to get API key from preferences.");
}

2. Type Safety (apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx)

  • Lines 18-34: The extractContent function uses unknown type with runtime checks. Consider defining a proper type for chunks:
interface ContentChunk {
  content?: string;
  text?: string;
}

3. Hardcoded API URL (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:50)

  • Consider making the API base URL configurable via preferences for flexibility (e.g., self-hosted instances)

4. Missing Input Validation (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts)

  • The API functions don't validate request parameters beyond checking empty content in the UI
  • Consider adding validation for:
    • URL format (if provided)
    • Content length limits
    • Project ID validity

5. Missing Tests

  • No test files found in the extension
  • Consider adding unit tests for:
    • API error handling scenarios
    • Search result parsing logic
    • Date formatting edge cases

6. Package.json Inconsistency

  • Line 50: ESLint version mismatch between package.json (^8.57.0) and package-lock.json (^9.22.0)
  • This should be aligned to avoid dependency conflicts

7. Rate Limiting Consideration

  • Search debouncing is good, but consider adding retry logic or exponential backoff for failed API requests
  • No protection against rapid successive submissions in add-memory form

8. Accessibility (apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx)

  • Line 182: Consider adding more descriptive accessibility text for screen readers beyond just the score percentage

🔒 Security Review

No critical security issues found

  • API keys properly handled as passwords
  • No credential exposure in code
  • HTTPS endpoint used
  • Bearer token authentication implemented correctly

⚠️ Minor considerations:

  • Consider adding request timeouts to prevent hanging connections
  • API responses are trusted without size limits (could be an issue with very large responses)

📊 Performance

  • ✅ Debounced search prevents excessive API calls
  • ✅ Limit of 50 results is reasonable
  • ⚠️ Consider implementing pagination for large result sets
  • ⚠️ No caching strategy for frequently accessed data (e.g., projects list)

🧪 Testing Recommendations

  1. Add unit tests for API client error scenarios
  2. Test handling of malformed API responses
  3. Test network timeout scenarios
  4. Test with empty/missing preferences
  5. Test with very long content strings

📝 Documentation

✅ Good:

  • README.md is clear and comprehensive
  • CHANGELOG.md follows good practices
  • Code comments where needed

🔧 Could improve:

  • Add JSDoc comments for exported functions in api.ts
  • Document the expected API response schemas

🎯 Verdict

Recommendation: Approve with minor suggestions

This is a solid, well-implemented Raycast extension that follows best practices. The code is clean, type-safe, and user-friendly. The suggestions above are non-blocking improvements that could be addressed in follow-up PRs or before merge depending on the team's preferences.

Great work on this feature! 🚀


Review generated with Claude Code

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 2, 2025

Code Review: Raycast Extension

Thank you for this comprehensive PR adding a Raycast extension! This is a great addition to the Supermemory ecosystem. Here's my detailed review:

Strengths

  1. Well-structured API layer (apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts)

    • Excellent error handling with custom error classes
    • Type-safe interfaces for all API contracts
    • Proper authentication flow with Bearer tokens
    • Good defensive programming (checks for content-type, status codes)
  2. Good UX patterns

    • Debounced search (500ms) prevents API spam
    • Loading states and toast notifications throughout
    • Connection checking before operations
    • Empty states with helpful messaging
  3. Clean component architecture

    • Separation of concerns (API, UI components)
    • Proper use of React hooks (useState, useEffect, useCallback)
    • Type-safe form handling

🐛 Potential Issues

High Priority

  1. Missing error recovery in add-memory.tsx (line 69)

    • When addMemory fails, pop() is never called, but the error is already displayed via toast
    • User might be stuck on the form
    • Suggestion: Consider whether to pop() on error or allow retry
  2. Race condition in search (search-memories.tsx:108)

    • The performSearch dependency in useEffect could cause infinite loops if not carefully managed
    • Suggestion: Remove performSearch from dependency array or use useRef for the function
  3. API endpoint inconsistency (api.ts:148, 164)

    • Using /v3/projects and /v3/documents but these aren't documented in CLAUDE.md
    • According to CLAUDE.md, the endpoints should exist, but verify they match the actual API spec
    • Suggestion: Confirm endpoint paths match backend implementation

Medium Priority

  1. Unsafe type casting (api.ts:113, 128)

    • Using as type assertions without runtime validation
    • Could lead to runtime errors if API response shape changes
    • Suggestion: Use Zod or similar for runtime validation (already a dependency in the monorepo)
  2. Memory leak potential (search-memories.tsx:103-107)

    • Debounce timeout cleanup is correct, but component could unmount during performSearch
    • Suggestion: Add abort controller for fetch requests or check if component is mounted
  3. Missing input validation (add-memory.tsx:50)

    • Only checks if content is empty, but doesn't validate max length
    • Could cause API errors if content exceeds backend limits
    • Suggestion: Add max length validation (check API limits)

Performance Considerations

  1. Unnecessary re-renders (add-memory.tsx:28-47)

    • loadProjects function recreated on every render
    • Suggestion: Wrap in useCallback or move outside component
  2. Search limit hardcoded (search-memories.tsx:74)

    • Limit set to 50 but no pagination or "load more"
    • Suggestion: Either add pagination or make limit configurable

🔒 Security Concerns

  1. API key in plaintext (package.json:35)

    • type: "password" is good, but ensure Raycast securely stores this
    • Verified: Raycast handles secure storage, this is correct
  2. No rate limiting client-side

    • Rapid searches could trigger rate limits
    • Suggestion: Consider adding exponential backoff on errors

🧪 Test Coverage

  1. No tests included
    • No unit tests for API functions
    • No integration tests for components
    • Suggestion: Add tests for:
      • API error handling paths
      • Search debouncing behavior
      • Form validation
      • Connection checking logic

📝 Code Quality

  1. TypeScript configuration (apps/raycast-extension/tsconfig.json)

    • Didn't see this file in the diff - please verify it exists and uses strict mode
    • Suggestion: Align with monorepo's @total-typescript/tsconfig
  2. Console.error usage (add-memory.tsx:40, 71; search-memories.tsx:87)

    • Using console.error for logging
    • Suggestion: Consider using Sentry (already in monorepo) for error tracking
  3. Magic strings (api.ts:50, 222)

    • Hardcoded URL https://supermemory.link/raycast
    • Suggestion: Move to constants.ts (you already updated this file)

📋 Documentation & Maintenance

  1. README.md is good but could add:

    • Development setup instructions
    • How to test locally
    • Contribution guidelines
  2. CHANGELOG.md format

    • Date format is {2025-09-27} - should this be actual date?
    • Version is "Initial Version" - consider using semantic versioning

🎯 Recommendations

Must Fix Before Merge:

Should Fix Before Merge:

Nice to Have:

🎉 Overall Assessment

This is a solid first version of the Raycast extension! The code is generally well-written with good TypeScript usage and proper separation of concerns. The main concerns are around error handling, race conditions, and lack of tests.

Recommendation: Fix the must-fix issues above before merging. The should-fix and nice-to-have items can be addressed in follow-up PRs.

Great work! 🚀

@graphite-app
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Oct 2, 2025

Movie gif. Robert Downey Jr as Tony Stark in Iron Man slides on sunglasses with a smooth grin on his face. He gives a thumbs up as people in business attire and military uniforms stand and clap behind him.  (Added via Giphy)

… raycast (#440)

feat(raycast-extension): initial version of supermemory extension for raycast

chore: update the metadata and ui for app to get api key

![supermemory-1.png](https://app.graphite.dev/user-attachments/assets/631a865e-8d7b-43df-8753-480f6b80a6d8.png)

![supermemory-2.png](https://app.graphite.dev/user-attachments/assets/956fff54-5447-4feb-a88b-8b465d4cda68.png)
@graphite-app graphite-app bot force-pushed the 09-24-feat_raycast-extension_initial_version_of_supermemory_extension_for_raycast branch from e0eaef2 to 163c9da Compare October 2, 2025 16:22
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 163c9da into main Oct 2, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 2, 2025

Pull Request Review: Raycast Extension

Thank you for implementing the Raycast extension for Supermemory! This is a well-structured addition that provides valuable functionality for Mac and Windows users. Here's my comprehensive review:

✅ Strengths

Code Quality

  • Clean Architecture: The separation of concerns between API logic (api.ts) and UI components is excellent
  • Type Safety: Great use of TypeScript with properly defined interfaces and types
  • Error Handling: Comprehensive error handling with custom error classes (SupermemoryAPIError, AuthenticationError)
  • User Experience: Good use of loading states, toasts, and debouncing for search

Best Practices

  • DRY Principle: The makeAuthenticatedRequest function effectively centralizes API calls
  • React Patterns: Proper use of hooks (useState, useEffect, useCallback) with dependency arrays
  • Async/Await: Consistent async patterns throughout the codebase

🔍 Issues & Recommendations

1. Security Concerns

API Key Exposure in URL

Location: apps/web/components/views/integrations.tsx:106

const [selectedShortcutType, setSelectedShortcutType] = useState<"add" | "search" | null>(null)

The iOS shortcut URLs pass API keys through URL parameters. While this is somewhat necessary for shortcuts, ensure:

  • API keys have limited scope (read/write to memories only, no admin functions)
  • Keys can be easily revoked by users
  • Consider implementing key rotation

Recommendation: Add documentation in the README about API key security best practices.


2. Error Handling Issues

Silent Error Catch

Location: apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:81-83

} catch {
  throw new AuthenticationError("Failed to get API key from preferences.");
}

Issue: The error is caught but not logged, making debugging difficult.

Fix:

} catch (error) {
  console.error("Failed to get API key from preferences:", error);
  throw new AuthenticationError("Failed to get API key from preferences.");
}

Similar Issue at Line 118

Location: apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts:118

} catch {
  // Ignore JSON parsing errors, use default message
}

Recommendation: At least log the error for debugging:

} catch (error) {
  console.error("Failed to parse error response:", error);
  // Use default message
}

3. Type Safety Issues

Unknown Type in Chunks

Location: apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx:21

chunks: unknown[];

Issue: Using unknown[] forces runtime type checking throughout the code.

Recommendation: Define a proper type:

interface Chunk {
  content?: string;
  text?: string;
}

export interface SearchResult {
  documentId: string;
  chunks: (string | Chunk)[];
  // ...
}

4. Potential Memory Leaks

Uncleared Timeout

Location: apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx:103-107

const debounceTimer = setTimeout(() => {
  performSearch(searchText);
}, 500);

return () => clearTimeout(debounceTimer);

Issue: While the cleanup is present, if performSearch is recreated frequently, it could cause unnecessary re-renders.

Fix: Add memoization dependencies check or consider using a custom debounce hook:

const debouncedSearch = useMemo(
  () => debounce((query: string) => performSearch(query), 500),
  [performSearch]
);

5. Missing Error Boundaries

The extension doesn't have error boundaries to catch React errors gracefully. If any component crashes, it could break the entire extension.

Recommendation: Add an error boundary component:

class ErrorBoundary extends React.Component {
  componentDidCatch(error, errorInfo) {
    showToast({
      style: Toast.Style.Failure,
      title: "Something went wrong",
      message: error.message
    });
  }
  render() {
    return this.props.children;
  }
}

6. Performance Considerations

Content Extraction Inefficiency

Location: apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx:15-40

The extractContent function is called multiple times per memory item. Consider memoizing this:

const contentMap = useMemo(() => {
  return new Map(searchResults.map(memory => [
    memory.documentId,
    extractContent(memory)
  ]));
}, [searchResults]);

7. Testing Concerns

Missing:

  • No unit tests for API functions
  • No integration tests for components
  • No error scenario testing

Recommendation: Add at least basic tests:

// api.test.ts
describe('addMemory', () => {
  it('should successfully add memory with valid data', async () => {
    // test implementation
  });
  
  it('should throw AuthenticationError with invalid API key', async () => {
    // test implementation
  });
});

8. Code Quality Issues

Magic Numbers

Location: apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx:74,105,124

limit: 50,  // Line 74
}, 500);    // Line 105
const truncateContent = (content: string, maxLength = 100) // Line 124

Recommendation: Extract to constants:

const SEARCH_LIMIT = 50;
const DEBOUNCE_DELAY_MS = 500;
const MAX_PREVIEW_LENGTH = 100;

Inconsistent Copy Button Handling

Location: apps/web/components/views/integrations.tsx:276

The same handleCopyApiKey function is used for both iOS and Raycast keys, but they have separate copied states (copied and raycastCopied). This could lead to bugs.

Fix: Pass the state setter as a parameter:

const handleCopyApiKey = async (apiKey: string, setCopiedState: (value: boolean) => void) => {
  try {
    await navigator.clipboard.writeText(apiKey);
    setCopiedState(true);
    toast.success("API key copied to clipboard!");
    setTimeout(() => setCopiedState(false), 2000);
  } catch {
    toast.error("Failed to copy API key");
  }
};

9. Documentation Issues

README Inconsistency

Location: apps/raycast-extension/README.md:32

You can get your API key from [supermemory.link/raycast](https://supermemory.link/raycast).

This URL is mentioned but it's unclear if this redirect is set up. Ensure the link is configured or update to direct link.


10. Package.json Issues

Dependencies Not Used

Location: apps/raycast-extension/package.json:44

"@raycast/utils": "^1.17.0"

Issue: The @raycast/utils package is listed as a dependency but not imported anywhere in the code.

Recommendation: Either use it (it has helpful hooks like useCachedPromise) or remove it.


🎯 Additional Recommendations

Monorepo Integration

  1. Build Scripts: Consider adding the Raycast extension to the root-level turbo build configuration
  2. Shared Types: The API types in api.ts could be shared with the main API application via a shared package
  3. Biome Configuration: Extend the root biome.json instead of using ESLint configuration

API Endpoint Versioning

The extension uses /v3/ endpoints. Ensure:

  • Version deprecation is communicated clearly
  • The extension handles version migration gracefully

Rate Limiting

No visible rate limiting or throttling on the API calls. Consider:

  • Implementing request throttling for search
  • Adding retry logic with exponential backoff

Accessibility

  • Ensure keyboard navigation works throughout
  • Add ARIA labels where appropriate (Raycast might handle this)

📊 Summary

Category Rating Notes
Code Quality ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Clean, well-structured code
Type Safety ⭐⭐⭐ Good types but some unknown usage
Error Handling ⭐⭐⭐ Comprehensive but some silent catches
Performance ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good use of debouncing and memoization
Security ⭐⭐⭐ API key handling needs review
Testing No tests present
Documentation ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good README and inline comments

Overall: This is a solid implementation that follows React and TypeScript best practices. The main areas for improvement are:

  1. Adding tests
  2. Improving error logging
  3. Refining type definitions
  4. Security review of API key handling

✅ Approval Status

The code is functional and well-written. The issues identified are mostly minor improvements rather than blocking concerns. I recommend:

  1. Merge: After addressing the error logging issues ([ImgBot] Optimize images #2)
  2. Follow-up PR: Add tests and improve type safety
  3. Documentation: Clarify the API key security model

Great work on this extension! 🚀


Files reviewed:

  • apps/raycast-extension/src/api.ts
  • apps/raycast-extension/src/add-memory.tsx
  • apps/raycast-extension/src/search-memories.tsx
  • apps/raycast-extension/package.json
  • apps/web/components/views/integrations.tsx
  • packages/lib/constants.ts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants