feat!: migrate utils/some-in-by to object/some-in-by

[Neerajpathak07]

Resolves #7372.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• migrates utils/some-in-by to object/some-in-by

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• resolves [RFC]: migrate utils/some-in-by to object/some-in-by #7372

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
namespace/alias2pkg	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}7/7$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/alias2standalone	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}7/7$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2alias	$\color{green}100/100$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}10/10$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}100/100$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2related	$\color{green}100/100$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}10/10$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}100/100$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2standalone	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}7/7$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/standalone2pkg	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}7/7$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
object/some-in-by	$\color{red}132/133$ $\color{green}+99.25\%$	$\color{red}13/14$ $\color{green}+92.86\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{red}132/133$ $\color{green}+99.25\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[Neerajpathak07]

@kgryte
I have created a tracking a list to make the PR review easy for migration of some of the utils pkgs to object:-

• feat: migrate utils/every-own-by to object/every-own-by #6753
• feat: migrate utils/any-own-by to object/any-own-by #6757
• feat!: migrate utils/none-in-by to object/none-in-by #6759
• feat: migrate utils/none-own-by to object/none-own-by #6805
• feat!: migrate utils/some-own-by to object/some-own-by #7375
• feat!: migrate utils/some-in-by to object/some-in-by #7376

[Neerajpathak07]

I believe there is an existing bug in some-in-by package similar coverage was also obtained in this PR:- #5745

[kgryte]

Not a bug; just incomplete tests.

[kgryte]

LGTM

[kgryte]

@Neerajpathak07 In the future, you want to do these migrations one package at a time and not have multiple PRs; otherwise, merging one will cause merge conflicts in the others. I'll work through the current PRs, but we'll need to adopt a sequential approach to reduce review/merge overhead.