Skip to content

Conversation

@tbraun96
Copy link

@tbraun96 tbraun96 commented Sep 8, 2023

In order for this repo to be usable by other up to date repos, we must update rusqlite

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Sep 8, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@jcnelson
Copy link
Member

jcnelson commented Sep 8, 2023

Closing as spam

@jcnelson jcnelson closed this Sep 8, 2023
@diwakergupta
Copy link
Contributor

Closing as spam

Why? AFAICT this is a legit contributor (e.g. see https://github.com/Trust-Machines/stacks-sbtc/pull/697). Closing a PR as spam without any explanations feels incredibly hostile to new contributors.

@tbraun96
Copy link
Author

Agreed, this was very rude.

@jcnelson
Copy link
Member

Hi, every so often we get one-line PRs like this with minimal explanation. In the past, they had originated from code bootcamps -- opening a PR is a homework assignment. That's one reason why it looked spammy.

Perhaps @tbraun96 can explain the context and need for this PR? The current version of rusqlite serves the project adequately. In general, simply bumping the version of a package is not enough for an approval. At the very least, the Cargo.lock file would need to be updated as well. The fact that the new Cargo.lock isn't part of this PR suggests that there was no attempt on the submitter's part to check that the project even builds with this change, let alone that tests pass (which contributed to my initial assessment that this is PR spam).

If this is part of adding async/await to TM's sBTC tooling, then perhaps the bigger question that needs answering is why the sBTC tooling is dependent on the version of rusqlite in this repository? Ideally there would be no dependency at all.

@blockstack-devops
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@stacks-network stacks-network locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 10, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants