Skip to content

feat: include source code of operators #1207

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dervoeti
Copy link
Member

Description

Last thing missing for #1069
This includes the operator source code in the container images. Or really: it will place an archive with the source code of anything built with ubi9-rust-builder inside the /app directory, just like copy_artifacts.sh does it for the generated SBOMs.

Additional fix: Merge two build stages in the Hadoop builder. The separation of these was accidentally introduced by #1186

Definition of Done Checklist

Note

Not all of these items are applicable to all PRs, the author should update this template to only leave the boxes in that are relevant.

Please make sure all these things are done and tick the boxes

  • Changes are OpenShift compatible
  • All added packages (via microdnf or otherwise) have a comment on why they are added
  • Things not downloaded from Red Hat repositories should be mirrored in the Stackable repository and downloaded from there
  • All packages should have (if available) signatures/hashes verified
  • Add an entry to the CHANGELOG.md file
  • Integration tests ran successfully
TIP: Running integration tests with a new product image

The image can be built and uploaded to the kind cluster with the following commands:

bake --product <product> --image-version <stackable-image-version>
kind load docker-image <image-tagged-with-the-major-version> --name=<name-of-your-test-cluster>

See the output of bake to retrieve the image tag for <image-tagged-with-the-major-version>.

@dervoeti dervoeti force-pushed the feat/operator-source-code branch from abf878e to 5b59a4b Compare July 17, 2025 14:56
@dervoeti dervoeti moved this to Development: Waiting for Review in Stackable Engineering Jul 17, 2025
@dervoeti dervoeti self-assigned this Jul 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Development: Waiting for Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant