Skip to content

Support for javax.jms.TextMessage [SWS-255] #411

@gregturn

Description

@gregturn

Tom Lambrechts opened SWS-255 and commented

One very intelligent person ones said:
"Be concervative in what you do; Be liberal in what you accept from others."

Two reasons to accept also JMS TextMessages next to BytesMessages.

  1. BytesMessage is only a standard for SOAP, what about POX?
  2. Not all providers send soap messages in a JMS BytesMessages, lot of the implementation use TextMessage

Attachments:

Issue Links:

Referenced from: commits 2d34abe, 9376403

1 votes, 1 watchers

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions