Skip to content

Conversation

@cha0s
Copy link
Contributor

@cha0s cha0s commented Jan 26, 2015

No description provided.

@cha0s
Copy link
Contributor Author

cha0s commented Jan 26, 2015

References socketio/socket.io-adapter#24

@rauchg
Copy link
Contributor

rauchg commented Jan 29, 2015

This API is 100% spot on

Readme.md Outdated
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would also add an example of getting all rooms

@cha0s
Copy link
Contributor Author

cha0s commented Jan 30, 2015

I added some examples to the docs

@barisusakli
Copy link

I assume, io.in('general').clients(); will also work?

@cha0s
Copy link
Contributor Author

cha0s commented Jan 30, 2015

Yeah, it reflects the broadcast API

@rauchg
Copy link
Contributor

rauchg commented Jan 30, 2015

We need to rebase again

@cha0s
Copy link
Contributor Author

cha0s commented Jan 30, 2015

I haven't done this for pull requests before. Do I just fix the history
and --force push? Will that work or will it screw things up?

On 01/30/2015 12:29 PM, Guillermo Rauch wrote:

We need to rebase again


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1966 (comment).

@rauchg
Copy link
Contributor

rauchg commented Jan 30, 2015

Up to you. You can simply just merge from master and regular-push

@cha0s
Copy link
Contributor Author

cha0s commented Jan 31, 2015

Well I tried rebasing off master but I didn't get any changes... So, I just force pushed to squash it into one commit. That cool?

@cha0s
Copy link
Contributor Author

cha0s commented Jan 31, 2015

Nevermind, I forgot to sync my fork with upstream :) should be good now.

rauchg added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2015
Suggestion for implementation of clients API
@rauchg rauchg merged commit 97c6568 into socketio:master Jan 31, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants