Skip to content

Conversation

@sungam3r
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #389

@0xced
Copy link
Member

0xced commented Aug 4, 2023

Based on discussion in #389 I think we should consider #391 instead of this pull request.

@sungam3r sungam3r closed this Aug 6, 2023
@sungam3r sungam3r deleted the using branch August 6, 2023 06:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Serilog:Using Check Seems Unnecessarily Restrictive

2 participants