Skip to content

Conversation

@Joao-Dionisio
Copy link
Member

Similar to #946, but without adding types to the arguments, as it was controversial.

We should probably also add a performance test at some point. Naturally, SCIP should be where the majority of time is spent, but maybe someone is doing a lot of stuff on the Python side.

The performance gain of this is probably marginal, but faster is better than slower, I suppose.

@DominikKamp
Copy link
Contributor

@Joao-Dionisio From my side this would be fine but some pyscipopt tests seem to fail although there is a green button so please have a look.

@Joao-Dionisio
Copy link
Member Author

@DominikKamp yeah, everything seems to be fine, you just need to approve the PR (I can't do it because I'm the one who created it).

@Joao-Dionisio Joao-Dionisio merged commit 12a76e9 into master Feb 1, 2025
1 check passed
@Joao-Dionisio Joao-Dionisio deleted the type-pr branch April 22, 2025 17:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants