Add support for Cython 3

[mkoeppe]

Just by adding some noexcept

Fixes #790 @bremner

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 110 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ea15747) 61.68% compared to head (42ae539) 52.70%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/pyscipopt/conshdlr.pxi	0.00%	22 Missing ⚠️
src/pyscipopt/benders.pxi	0.00%	14 Missing ⚠️
src/pyscipopt/branchrule.pxi	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️
src/pyscipopt/event.pxi	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️
src/pyscipopt/nodesel.pxi	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
src/pyscipopt/pricer.pxi	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
src/pyscipopt/sepa.pxi	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
src/pyscipopt/benderscut.pxi	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
src/pyscipopt/heuristic.pxi	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
src/pyscipopt/relax.pxi	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
... and 3 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #792      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.68%   52.70%   -8.99%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines        3255     3808     +553     
==========================================
- Hits         2008     2007       -1     
- Misses       1247     1801     +554     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[leoneifler]

Thank you for updating this. Just needs a one-line CHANGELOG entry, looks ready to merge otherwise 👍

[mkoeppe]

Note that I have not removed the version constraint, so when build isolation is in use, it continues to use Cython 0.29.x.
If you want me to change this in this PR, let me know

[leoneifler]

Note that I have not removed the version constraint, so when build isolation is in use, it continues to use Cython 0.29.x. If you want me to change this in this PR, let me know

Good point. I think since it is now supported, it makes sense to raise the version requirement, as well. Or is there any reason against this that I am not seeing?

[mkoeppe]

is there any reason against this that I am not seeing?

Not really, but I haven't tested anything other than that it compiles.

[mmghannam]

Thanks @mkoeppe for your contribution! For some reason the code coverage tool seems to be unhappy with this although the lines changes were not covered before. But it looks good to me!

[mkoeppe]

Thanks!