CommandInfo: allow shadowed Service parameters #422
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When a command extends another command, we often have both classes use specific services. It's better to be able to name these Service parameters consistently, than to avoid shadowing parameters at all costs. So let's exclude all Service parameters from the validity check.
Member
|
Great! |
This was referenced Jan 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a
Commandextends anotherCommand, we often have both classes use specific services.It's better to be able to name these
Serviceparameters consistently, than to avoid shadowing parameters at all costs. So let's exclude allServiceparameters from the validity check.Closes #408.