Fix for union-types-spec documentation #9683
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a small issue with an unclosed code block
dottybot
reviewed
Aug 30, 2020
|
I've tried signing the CLA, but I'm getting code 500 on it, could someone check? Either way, since it is a such a small change, someone else who has already signed could make the change in another PR. |
|
I've manually verified the CLA signing worked, but I just merged #9777 which implements the same change, sorry for not seeing your change before! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a small issue with an unclosed code block making the rendering look weird: https://dotty.epfl.ch/docs/reference/new-types/union-types-spec.html