Skip to content

Conversation

@odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented Aug 29, 2019

If the result of a covariant type variable interpolation would be type Nothing,
wait instead. This could make the variable be inferred to its upper bound after all,
if we do not need a fully instantiated type right away.

odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2019
If the result of a covariant type variable interpolation would be a bottom type,
wait instead. This could make the variable be inferred to its upper bound after all,
if we do not need a fully instantiated type right away.

This makes a difference for indentation whereever we have a situation like this:
```
  def foo: T =
    bla.asInstanceOf
```
With indentation on, this is now equivalent to
```
  def foo: T = {
    bla.asInstanceof
  }
```
This means there is now an added opportunity for an interpolation step, of
the asInstanceOf, which would go downwards to Nothing. So indentation changes
the inferred type, which is very bad. With the commit the problem is
avoided.

The commit is broken out separately into PR scala#7130.
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2019
If the result of a covariant type variable interpolation would be a bottom type,
wait instead. This could make the variable be inferred to its upper bound after all,
if we do not need a fully instantiated type right away.

This makes a difference for indentation whereever we have a situation like this:
```
  def foo: T =
    bla.asInstanceOf
```
With indentation on, this is now equivalent to
```
  def foo: T = {
    bla.asInstanceof
  }
```
This means there is now an added opportunity for an interpolation step, of
the asInstanceOf, which would go downwards to Nothing. So indentation changes
the inferred type, which is very bad. With the commit the problem is
avoided.

The commit is broken out separately into PR scala#7130.
@odersky odersky changed the title Don't interpolate downwards to a bottom type Don't interpolate downwards to Nothing Aug 29, 2019
If the result of a covariant type variable interpolation would be a bottom type,
wait instead. This could make the variable be inferred to its upper bound after all,
if we do not need a fully instantiated type right away.
@odersky odersky force-pushed the fix-interpolation branch from 419d232 to 119752f Compare August 29, 2019 13:09
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2019
If the result of a covariant type variable interpolation would be a bottom type,
wait instead. This could make the variable be inferred to its upper bound after all,
if we do not need a fully instantiated type right away.

This makes a difference for indentation whereever we have a situation like this:
```
  def foo: T =
    bla.asInstanceOf
```
With indentation on, this is now equivalent to
```
  def foo: T = {
    bla.asInstanceof
  }
```
This means there is now an added opportunity for an interpolation step, of
the asInstanceOf, which would go downwards to Nothing. So indentation changes
the inferred type, which is very bad. With the commit the problem is
avoided.

The commit is broken out separately into PR scala#7130.
i536.scala previously compiled since the type argument was inferred to be Nothing.
But that inference is useless; it just hides a runtime failure. The issue scala#536
only complained that the compiler crashed, so having a negative outcome
is permissible.
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2019
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2019
@odersky
Copy link
Contributor Author

odersky commented Aug 30, 2019

This was merged as part of #7114

@odersky odersky closed this Aug 30, 2019
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2019
Undo the change where we do not interpolate a type variable if
its lower bound is nothing. It turned out this broke type inference.
odersky added a commit to dotty-staging/dotty that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant