Skip to content

Fix typos #21913

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/_docs/contributing/architecture/types.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Ground Type has no meaningful underlying type, typically it is the type of metho
definitions, but also union types and intersection types, along with utility types of the
compiler.

Here's a diagram, serving as the mental model of the most important and distinct types available after the `typer` phase, derived from [dotty/tools/dotc/core/Types.scala][1]:
Here's a diagram, serving as the mental model of the most important and distinct types available after the `typer` phase, derived from [Types.scala]:

```
Type -+- proxy_type --+- NamedType --------+- TypeRef
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/_docs/internals/gadts.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ Right now, we record GADT constraints for:
- function/method type parameters
- class type parameters

There is a branch on the way which will also record them for type members (so path-dependent types) and singleton types. It has a paper associated: "Implementing path-depepdent GADTs for Scala 3".
There is a branch on the way which will also record them for type members (so path-dependent types) and singleton types. It has a paper associated: "Implementing path-dependent GADTs for Scala 3".

### What are necessary relationships? Any examples?

Expand Down