Skip to content

Super Bootstrap: Make dottydoc part of the bootstrap #2082

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 20, 2017

Conversation

smarter
Copy link
Member

@smarter smarter commented Mar 12, 2017

This wasn't done before because dotty could not compile dottydoc, this
got fixed by PRs #2070 and #2076.

@smarter smarter requested a review from felixmulder March 12, 2017 16:27
@smarter
Copy link
Member Author

smarter commented Mar 12, 2017

Heh, this found a bug in dotty! See #2084

DarkDimius and others added 3 commits March 20, 2017 14:18
This wasn't done before because dotty could not compile dottydoc, this
is now fixed.
@smarter smarter force-pushed the add/dottydoc-bootstrap branch from 9ee4219 to d706344 Compare March 20, 2017 13:20
@smarter
Copy link
Member Author

smarter commented Mar 20, 2017

@felixmulder Looks like this is finally green!

@felixmulder felixmulder merged commit f45dbe7 into scala:master Mar 20, 2017
@felixmulder
Copy link
Contributor

Indeed, congrats!

@smarter
Copy link
Member Author

smarter commented Mar 20, 2017

@felixmulder Did you rebase instead of making a merge commit? So far we've always used merge commits and mixing the two styles would be really confusing. Plus, currently we only require the latest commit to pass the tests, as long as we use merge commits this isn't too much of a problem since we can still do bisection based on merge commits, but if we don't have merge commits it becomes impossible to do bisection.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants