Skip to content

Use more precise explanation for opaque transparency #16480

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/_docs/reference/other-new-features/opaques.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -174,6 +174,6 @@ val z = l2(3.1)
l1.mul(x, y) // type checks
l1.mul(x, z) // error: found l2.Logarithm, required l1.Logarithm
```
In general, one can think of an opaque type as being only transparent in the scope of `private[this]`.
In general, one can think of an opaque type as being only transparent in the scope of `private[this]` (unless the type is a top level definition - in this case, it's transparent only within the file it's defined in).

[More details](opaques-details.md)